Report on argumentation and teacher education in Europe

Maria Pilar Jimenez-Aleixandre, Blanca Puig Mauriz, Juan Ramón Gallástegui Otero, Allan Blake

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

Abstract

This document will ultimately form part of a comprehensive package of materials for teacher education and professional development in argumentation. The initial deliverable from Kaunas University of Technology described the rhetorical basis of argumentation theory for pre‐ and in‐service teachers, whilst this state of the art report sets out the current and rather unsatisfactory status of argumentation in curricula, initial teacher training/education and teacher professional development, across the fifteen S‐TEAM partner countries. We believe that this is a representative sample and that the report can be taken as a reliable snapshot of the situation in Europe generally.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages81
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

argumentation
teacher
education
teacher training
curriculum

Keywords

  • science teaching
  • science teacher education
  • argumentation

Cite this

Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Mauriz, B. P., Gallástegui Otero, J. R., & Blake, A. (2010). Report on argumentation and teacher education in Europe.
Jimenez-Aleixandre, Maria Pilar ; Mauriz, Blanca Puig ; Gallástegui Otero, Juan Ramón ; Blake, Allan. / Report on argumentation and teacher education in Europe. 2010. 81 p.
@book{d91bc30085954c618eb44243900745aa,
title = "Report on argumentation and teacher education in Europe",
abstract = "This document will ultimately form part of a comprehensive package of materials for teacher education and professional development in argumentation. The initial deliverable from Kaunas University of Technology described the rhetorical basis of argumentation theory for pre‐ and in‐service teachers, whilst this state of the art report sets out the current and rather unsatisfactory status of argumentation in curricula, initial teacher training/education and teacher professional development, across the fifteen S‐TEAM partner countries. We believe that this is a representative sample and that the report can be taken as a reliable snapshot of the situation in Europe generally.",
keywords = "science teaching, science teacher education, argumentation",
author = "Jimenez-Aleixandre, {Maria Pilar} and Mauriz, {Blanca Puig} and {Gall{\'a}stegui Otero}, {Juan Ram{\'o}n} and Allan Blake",
year = "2010",
language = "English",

}

Jimenez-Aleixandre, MP, Mauriz, BP, Gallástegui Otero, JR & Blake, A 2010, Report on argumentation and teacher education in Europe.

Report on argumentation and teacher education in Europe. / Jimenez-Aleixandre, Maria Pilar; Mauriz, Blanca Puig; Gallástegui Otero, Juan Ramón ; Blake, Allan.

2010. 81 p.

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

TY - BOOK

T1 - Report on argumentation and teacher education in Europe

AU - Jimenez-Aleixandre, Maria Pilar

AU - Mauriz, Blanca Puig

AU - Gallástegui Otero, Juan Ramón

AU - Blake, Allan

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This document will ultimately form part of a comprehensive package of materials for teacher education and professional development in argumentation. The initial deliverable from Kaunas University of Technology described the rhetorical basis of argumentation theory for pre‐ and in‐service teachers, whilst this state of the art report sets out the current and rather unsatisfactory status of argumentation in curricula, initial teacher training/education and teacher professional development, across the fifteen S‐TEAM partner countries. We believe that this is a representative sample and that the report can be taken as a reliable snapshot of the situation in Europe generally.

AB - This document will ultimately form part of a comprehensive package of materials for teacher education and professional development in argumentation. The initial deliverable from Kaunas University of Technology described the rhetorical basis of argumentation theory for pre‐ and in‐service teachers, whilst this state of the art report sets out the current and rather unsatisfactory status of argumentation in curricula, initial teacher training/education and teacher professional development, across the fifteen S‐TEAM partner countries. We believe that this is a representative sample and that the report can be taken as a reliable snapshot of the situation in Europe generally.

KW - science teaching

KW - science teacher education

KW - argumentation

UR - https://www.ntnu.no/wiki/download/attachments/27591468/11++-+Report.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1297858419000

M3 - Commissioned report

BT - Report on argumentation and teacher education in Europe

ER -

Jimenez-Aleixandre MP, Mauriz BP, Gallástegui Otero JR, Blake A. Report on argumentation and teacher education in Europe. 2010. 81 p.