Reply to comment on 'Collective effects in bremsstrahlung in plasmas'

V. N. Tsytovich, R. Bingham, U. de Angelis, A. Forlani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We reply here to a criticism of our paper (Tsytovich et al. 1996) by Iglesias (1997).

In our paper we present a very general formulation of collective effects in bremsstrahlung that is valid for any non-equilibrium non-Maxwellian particle distribution. This result is given in (2.20) early in the paper. The standard treatments of bremsstrahlung found in books like Bekefi (1966) are only for thermal plasmas, where the fluctuation–dissipation theorem is valid. Note that the fluctuation–dissipation theorem cannot be used for non-thermal or non-dipole fields, and in this respect the method we use is more general. Our method is the more complex of the approaches used, but, as stated, it can handle situations that cannot be treated by the standard approach. Our main result is the formula (2.20), which is valid for any non-equilibrium non-Maxwellian particle distribution, and which cannot be found anywhere else in the literature. Furthermore, we find new qualitative effects indicating that the ion–ion bremsstrahlung (which is always neglected in the literature) is not small in the case where the collective effects are taken into account, and is in fact, for certain frequencies, of the order of the electron–electron bremsstrahlung. The other qualitatively new result is that, where collective effects are important, the electron–electron bremsstrahlung is not of the order v2Te/c2, as it is for the case in the absence of collective effects, but of the order ω2pe/ω2 times less – which, for example in the solar interior, where ω2pe/ω2 is of the order of v2Te/c2, is then of the order of v4Te/c4.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)447-448
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Plasma Physics
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1998

Fingerprint

bremsstrahlung
theorems
solar interior
thermal plasmas
formulations

Keywords

  • bremsstrahlung
  • plasmas
  • particle distribution

Cite this

Tsytovich, V. N. ; Bingham, R. ; Angelis, U. de ; Forlani, A. / Reply to comment on 'Collective effects in bremsstrahlung in plasmas'. In: Journal of Plasma Physics. 1998 ; Vol. 60, No. 2. pp. 447-448.
@article{2552c133aa5a402593577cc11760e06e,
title = "Reply to comment on 'Collective effects in bremsstrahlung in plasmas'",
abstract = "We reply here to a criticism of our paper (Tsytovich et al. 1996) by Iglesias (1997).In our paper we present a very general formulation of collective effects in bremsstrahlung that is valid for any non-equilibrium non-Maxwellian particle distribution. This result is given in (2.20) early in the paper. The standard treatments of bremsstrahlung found in books like Bekefi (1966) are only for thermal plasmas, where the fluctuation–dissipation theorem is valid. Note that the fluctuation–dissipation theorem cannot be used for non-thermal or non-dipole fields, and in this respect the method we use is more general. Our method is the more complex of the approaches used, but, as stated, it can handle situations that cannot be treated by the standard approach. Our main result is the formula (2.20), which is valid for any non-equilibrium non-Maxwellian particle distribution, and which cannot be found anywhere else in the literature. Furthermore, we find new qualitative effects indicating that the ion–ion bremsstrahlung (which is always neglected in the literature) is not small in the case where the collective effects are taken into account, and is in fact, for certain frequencies, of the order of the electron–electron bremsstrahlung. The other qualitatively new result is that, where collective effects are important, the electron–electron bremsstrahlung is not of the order v2Te/c2, as it is for the case in the absence of collective effects, but of the order ω2pe/ω2 times less – which, for example in the solar interior, where ω2pe/ω2 is of the order of v2Te/c2, is then of the order of v4Te/c4.",
keywords = "bremsstrahlung, plasmas, particle distribution",
author = "Tsytovich, {V. N.} and R. Bingham and Angelis, {U. de} and A. Forlani",
year = "1998",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1017/S0022377898006953",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "447--448",
journal = "Journal of Plasma Physics",
issn = "0022-3778",
number = "2",

}

Reply to comment on 'Collective effects in bremsstrahlung in plasmas'. / Tsytovich, V. N.; Bingham, R.; Angelis, U. de; Forlani, A.

In: Journal of Plasma Physics, Vol. 60, No. 2, 09.1998, p. 447-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to comment on 'Collective effects in bremsstrahlung in plasmas'

AU - Tsytovich, V. N.

AU - Bingham, R.

AU - Angelis, U. de

AU - Forlani, A.

PY - 1998/9

Y1 - 1998/9

N2 - We reply here to a criticism of our paper (Tsytovich et al. 1996) by Iglesias (1997).In our paper we present a very general formulation of collective effects in bremsstrahlung that is valid for any non-equilibrium non-Maxwellian particle distribution. This result is given in (2.20) early in the paper. The standard treatments of bremsstrahlung found in books like Bekefi (1966) are only for thermal plasmas, where the fluctuation–dissipation theorem is valid. Note that the fluctuation–dissipation theorem cannot be used for non-thermal or non-dipole fields, and in this respect the method we use is more general. Our method is the more complex of the approaches used, but, as stated, it can handle situations that cannot be treated by the standard approach. Our main result is the formula (2.20), which is valid for any non-equilibrium non-Maxwellian particle distribution, and which cannot be found anywhere else in the literature. Furthermore, we find new qualitative effects indicating that the ion–ion bremsstrahlung (which is always neglected in the literature) is not small in the case where the collective effects are taken into account, and is in fact, for certain frequencies, of the order of the electron–electron bremsstrahlung. The other qualitatively new result is that, where collective effects are important, the electron–electron bremsstrahlung is not of the order v2Te/c2, as it is for the case in the absence of collective effects, but of the order ω2pe/ω2 times less – which, for example in the solar interior, where ω2pe/ω2 is of the order of v2Te/c2, is then of the order of v4Te/c4.

AB - We reply here to a criticism of our paper (Tsytovich et al. 1996) by Iglesias (1997).In our paper we present a very general formulation of collective effects in bremsstrahlung that is valid for any non-equilibrium non-Maxwellian particle distribution. This result is given in (2.20) early in the paper. The standard treatments of bremsstrahlung found in books like Bekefi (1966) are only for thermal plasmas, where the fluctuation–dissipation theorem is valid. Note that the fluctuation–dissipation theorem cannot be used for non-thermal or non-dipole fields, and in this respect the method we use is more general. Our method is the more complex of the approaches used, but, as stated, it can handle situations that cannot be treated by the standard approach. Our main result is the formula (2.20), which is valid for any non-equilibrium non-Maxwellian particle distribution, and which cannot be found anywhere else in the literature. Furthermore, we find new qualitative effects indicating that the ion–ion bremsstrahlung (which is always neglected in the literature) is not small in the case where the collective effects are taken into account, and is in fact, for certain frequencies, of the order of the electron–electron bremsstrahlung. The other qualitatively new result is that, where collective effects are important, the electron–electron bremsstrahlung is not of the order v2Te/c2, as it is for the case in the absence of collective effects, but of the order ω2pe/ω2 times less – which, for example in the solar interior, where ω2pe/ω2 is of the order of v2Te/c2, is then of the order of v4Te/c4.

KW - bremsstrahlung

KW - plasmas

KW - particle distribution

U2 - 10.1017/S0022377898006953

DO - 10.1017/S0022377898006953

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 447

EP - 448

JO - Journal of Plasma Physics

JF - Journal of Plasma Physics

SN - 0022-3778

IS - 2

ER -