Religion, securitization and anti-immigration attitudes: the case of Greece

G. Karyotis, S. Patrikios

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article revisits securitization theory of the Copenhagen School by addressing an empirical overemphasis on political actors and offering a quantitative extension to typically qualitative assessments of the theory. Using Greece as a case study, it explores the dynamics of competition and the relative discursive power of two actors, political and religious elites, regarding migration. After first documenting a divergence in the two actors' rhetoric through discourse analysis, it proceeds to measure the relative impact of their discourses on public immigration attitudes, employing structural equation modelling of European Social Survey data. Findings demonstrate that exposure to the securitizing religious discourse through church attendance immunizes citizens from the softening effect of the political message. This, in turn, explains the survival of the security frame on migration in Greece, even as political elites begin to move towards the desecuritized pole of the continuum. Crucially, the analysis of this case suggests that a methodological synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research methods to study securitization is possible despite limitations. The authors call for greater efforts to combine the two methods which would allow for a better understanding of securitization and desecuritization processes.
LanguageEnglish
Pages43-57
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Peace Research
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Religious buildings
political actor
Greece
Poles
immigration
Religion
migration
church attendance
ESS
discourse
quantitative research
political elite
Pole
quantitative method
discourse analysis
divergence
research method
qualitative research
rhetoric
elite

Keywords

  • Greece
  • migration
  • qualitative-quantitative synthesis
  • religion
  • securitization

Cite this

@article{b8279f18796d4408b22704cc631c7a0b,
title = "Religion, securitization and anti-immigration attitudes: the case of Greece",
abstract = "This article revisits securitization theory of the Copenhagen School by addressing an empirical overemphasis on political actors and offering a quantitative extension to typically qualitative assessments of the theory. Using Greece as a case study, it explores the dynamics of competition and the relative discursive power of two actors, political and religious elites, regarding migration. After first documenting a divergence in the two actors' rhetoric through discourse analysis, it proceeds to measure the relative impact of their discourses on public immigration attitudes, employing structural equation modelling of European Social Survey data. Findings demonstrate that exposure to the securitizing religious discourse through church attendance immunizes citizens from the softening effect of the political message. This, in turn, explains the survival of the security frame on migration in Greece, even as political elites begin to move towards the desecuritized pole of the continuum. Crucially, the analysis of this case suggests that a methodological synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research methods to study securitization is possible despite limitations. The authors call for greater efforts to combine the two methods which would allow for a better understanding of securitization and desecuritization processes.",
keywords = "Greece, migration, qualitative-quantitative synthesis, religion, securitization",
author = "G. Karyotis and S. Patrikios",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022343309350021",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "43--57",
journal = "Journal of Peace Research",
issn = "0022-3433",
number = "1",

}

Religion, securitization and anti-immigration attitudes : the case of Greece. / Karyotis, G.; Patrikios, S.

In: Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 47, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 43-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Religion, securitization and anti-immigration attitudes

T2 - Journal of Peace Research

AU - Karyotis, G.

AU - Patrikios, S.

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - This article revisits securitization theory of the Copenhagen School by addressing an empirical overemphasis on political actors and offering a quantitative extension to typically qualitative assessments of the theory. Using Greece as a case study, it explores the dynamics of competition and the relative discursive power of two actors, political and religious elites, regarding migration. After first documenting a divergence in the two actors' rhetoric through discourse analysis, it proceeds to measure the relative impact of their discourses on public immigration attitudes, employing structural equation modelling of European Social Survey data. Findings demonstrate that exposure to the securitizing religious discourse through church attendance immunizes citizens from the softening effect of the political message. This, in turn, explains the survival of the security frame on migration in Greece, even as political elites begin to move towards the desecuritized pole of the continuum. Crucially, the analysis of this case suggests that a methodological synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research methods to study securitization is possible despite limitations. The authors call for greater efforts to combine the two methods which would allow for a better understanding of securitization and desecuritization processes.

AB - This article revisits securitization theory of the Copenhagen School by addressing an empirical overemphasis on political actors and offering a quantitative extension to typically qualitative assessments of the theory. Using Greece as a case study, it explores the dynamics of competition and the relative discursive power of two actors, political and religious elites, regarding migration. After first documenting a divergence in the two actors' rhetoric through discourse analysis, it proceeds to measure the relative impact of their discourses on public immigration attitudes, employing structural equation modelling of European Social Survey data. Findings demonstrate that exposure to the securitizing religious discourse through church attendance immunizes citizens from the softening effect of the political message. This, in turn, explains the survival of the security frame on migration in Greece, even as political elites begin to move towards the desecuritized pole of the continuum. Crucially, the analysis of this case suggests that a methodological synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research methods to study securitization is possible despite limitations. The authors call for greater efforts to combine the two methods which would allow for a better understanding of securitization and desecuritization processes.

KW - Greece

KW - migration

KW - qualitative-quantitative synthesis

KW - religion

KW - securitization

U2 - 10.1177/0022343309350021

DO - 10.1177/0022343309350021

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 43

EP - 57

JO - Journal of Peace Research

JF - Journal of Peace Research

SN - 0022-3433

IS - 1

ER -