Reliable qualitative data for safety and risk management

John B. Davies, A. Ross, M. Plunkett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many industries collect event data on technical, operational and human factors failures, which include short textual or 'qualitative' reports. These reports, whilst often rich in information about the motives and intentions of staff, offer a particular analysis problem, and consequently they often accumulate in filing cabinets with their potential as decision-making aids unrealized. In this paper we will argue that textual (or verbal) accounts are quite acceptable as evidence in safety management, provided they are dealt with rigorously and systematically. The watchword for what should or should not be accepted into risk models or safety databases is reliability. Reliable data generated from 'the things people say' should not be seen as inherently 'less worthy' than reliable data from any other source. In fact, once reliability is established, frequency output from coded discourse can be treated much as frequencies from any engineered system, and are just as amenable to statistical manipulation. The result of taking the time to analyse such data fully is an integrated risk management system where the 'soft' versus 'hard' data distinction is replaced by a 'reliable' versus 'unreliable' data model, this paradigm offering maximum benefit from data collected.
LanguageEnglish
Pages117-121
Number of pages4
JournalProcess Safety and Environmental Protection
Volume83
Issue numberB2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Risk management
safety
Human engineering
Data structures
Decision making
Industry
risk management
decision making
industry

Keywords

  • qualitative
  • reliability
  • safety
  • risk management
  • psychology
  • personality
  • human factors

Cite this

Davies, John B. ; Ross, A. ; Plunkett, M. / Reliable qualitative data for safety and risk management. In: Process Safety and Environmental Protection . 2005 ; Vol. 83, No. B2. pp. 117-121.
@article{cf2c214398d045d6a3c64a3de67523af,
title = "Reliable qualitative data for safety and risk management",
abstract = "Many industries collect event data on technical, operational and human factors failures, which include short textual or 'qualitative' reports. These reports, whilst often rich in information about the motives and intentions of staff, offer a particular analysis problem, and consequently they often accumulate in filing cabinets with their potential as decision-making aids unrealized. In this paper we will argue that textual (or verbal) accounts are quite acceptable as evidence in safety management, provided they are dealt with rigorously and systematically. The watchword for what should or should not be accepted into risk models or safety databases is reliability. Reliable data generated from 'the things people say' should not be seen as inherently 'less worthy' than reliable data from any other source. In fact, once reliability is established, frequency output from coded discourse can be treated much as frequencies from any engineered system, and are just as amenable to statistical manipulation. The result of taking the time to analyse such data fully is an integrated risk management system where the 'soft' versus 'hard' data distinction is replaced by a 'reliable' versus 'unreliable' data model, this paradigm offering maximum benefit from data collected.",
keywords = "qualitative, reliability, safety, risk management, psychology, personality, human factors",
author = "Davies, {John B.} and A. Ross and M. Plunkett",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1205/psep.04239",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "117--121",
journal = "Process Safety and Environmental Protection",
issn = "0957-5820",
number = "B2",

}

Reliable qualitative data for safety and risk management. / Davies, John B.; Ross, A.; Plunkett, M.

In: Process Safety and Environmental Protection , Vol. 83, No. B2, 2005, p. 117-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliable qualitative data for safety and risk management

AU - Davies, John B.

AU - Ross, A.

AU - Plunkett, M.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Many industries collect event data on technical, operational and human factors failures, which include short textual or 'qualitative' reports. These reports, whilst often rich in information about the motives and intentions of staff, offer a particular analysis problem, and consequently they often accumulate in filing cabinets with their potential as decision-making aids unrealized. In this paper we will argue that textual (or verbal) accounts are quite acceptable as evidence in safety management, provided they are dealt with rigorously and systematically. The watchword for what should or should not be accepted into risk models or safety databases is reliability. Reliable data generated from 'the things people say' should not be seen as inherently 'less worthy' than reliable data from any other source. In fact, once reliability is established, frequency output from coded discourse can be treated much as frequencies from any engineered system, and are just as amenable to statistical manipulation. The result of taking the time to analyse such data fully is an integrated risk management system where the 'soft' versus 'hard' data distinction is replaced by a 'reliable' versus 'unreliable' data model, this paradigm offering maximum benefit from data collected.

AB - Many industries collect event data on technical, operational and human factors failures, which include short textual or 'qualitative' reports. These reports, whilst often rich in information about the motives and intentions of staff, offer a particular analysis problem, and consequently they often accumulate in filing cabinets with their potential as decision-making aids unrealized. In this paper we will argue that textual (or verbal) accounts are quite acceptable as evidence in safety management, provided they are dealt with rigorously and systematically. The watchword for what should or should not be accepted into risk models or safety databases is reliability. Reliable data generated from 'the things people say' should not be seen as inherently 'less worthy' than reliable data from any other source. In fact, once reliability is established, frequency output from coded discourse can be treated much as frequencies from any engineered system, and are just as amenable to statistical manipulation. The result of taking the time to analyse such data fully is an integrated risk management system where the 'soft' versus 'hard' data distinction is replaced by a 'reliable' versus 'unreliable' data model, this paradigm offering maximum benefit from data collected.

KW - qualitative

KW - reliability

KW - safety

KW - risk management

KW - psychology

KW - personality

KW - human factors

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1205/psep.04239

U2 - 10.1205/psep.04239

DO - 10.1205/psep.04239

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 117

EP - 121

JO - Process Safety and Environmental Protection

T2 - Process Safety and Environmental Protection

JF - Process Safety and Environmental Protection

SN - 0957-5820

IS - B2

ER -