Reliability comparison of wind turbines with DFIG and PMG drive trains

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)
554 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Modern wind turbines vary greatly in their drive train configurations. With the variety of options available, it can be difficult to determine which type is most suitable for on and offshore applications. A large percentage of modern drive trains consist of either doubly fed induction generators with partially rated converters or permanent magnet generators with fully rated converters. These configurations are the focus of this empirical reliability comparison. The turbine population for this analysis contains over 1800 doubly fed induction generators, partially rated converter wind turbines, and 400 permanent magnet generator fully rated converter wind turbines. The turbines analyzed are identical except for their drive train configurations and are modern MW scale turbines making this population the largest and most modern encountered in the literature review. Results of the analysis include overall failure rates, failure rates per operational year, failure rates per failure mode, and failure rates per failure cost category for the two drive train configurations. These results contribute toward deciding on the most suitable turbine type for a particular site, as well as toward cost of energy comparisons for different drive train types. A comparison between failure rates from this analysis and failure rates from similar analyses is also shown in this paper.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)663-670
Number of pages8
JournalIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion
Volume30
Issue number2
Early online date26 Nov 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2015

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • converter
  • doubly fed induction generator (DFIG)
  • drive train
  • failure mode
  • failure rate
  • fully rated converter (FRC)
  • generator
  • permanent magnet generator (PMG)
  • reliability
  • wind turbines
  • renewable energy

Cite this