Reliability comparison of DFIG drive train configuration with PMG drive train configuration in the first 5 years of operation

James Carroll, Alasdair McDonald, David McMillan

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
115 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Modern wind turbines vary greatly in their drive train configurations. With the variety of options available it can be difficult to determine which type is most suitable for on and offshore applications. A large percentage of modern drive trains consist of either doubly fed induction generators with partially rated converters or permanent magnet generators with fully rated converters. These configurations were the focus of this empirical reliability comparison. The turbine population for the analysis contained over 1800 doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) turbines and 400 permanent magnet generator (PMG) fully rated converter (FRC) turbines. The findings of this analysis show that, due to the poorer reliability of the FRC, the DFIG configuration proved the most reliable.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2014
Event3rd Renewable Power Generation Conference (RPG) - Naples, Italy
Duration: 24 Sept 201425 Sept 2014

Conference

Conference3rd Renewable Power Generation Conference (RPG)
Country/TerritoryItaly
CityNaples
Period24/09/1425/09/14

Keywords

  • doubly fed induction generator
  • DFIG
  • permanent magnet generator
  • PMG
  • wind turbines
  • drive trains
  • DFIG configurations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability comparison of DFIG drive train configuration with PMG drive train configuration in the first 5 years of operation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this