Regulatory capitalism, decentred enforcement and its legal consequences for digital expression: the use of copyright law to restrict freedom of speech online

Benjamin Farrand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Copyright as currently understood is justified by the belief that the protection it grants to creators incentivises the continued creation of works deemed culturally beneficial to society. However, its use can be less altruistic, as a means of suppressing embarrassing or controversial information. The ability to disseminate sensitive material quickly through the Internet concerns both State and non-State actors, and there are indications that through the use of private intermediaries, copyright can be used to suppress speech. This article shall seek to explain how the current neoliberal system of governance blurs the line between public and private actors, creating a diffused and decentralised system of copyright enforcement that allows for the suppression of speech in a way that avoids discussion of censorship.
LanguageEnglish
Pages404-422
JournalJournal of Information Technology and Politics
Volume10
Issue number4
Early online date18 Sep 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

capitalist society
censorship
suppression
grant
indication
Internet
governance
ability
Society

Keywords

  • copyright
  • neoliberalism
  • regulatory capitalism
  • freedom of expression
  • censorship
  • fair use
  • intermediaries

Cite this

@article{50fbcf8033744df7b44a0adb853237b6,
title = "Regulatory capitalism, decentred enforcement and its legal consequences for digital expression: the use of copyright law to restrict freedom of speech online",
abstract = "Copyright as currently understood is justified by the belief that the protection it grants to creators incentivises the continued creation of works deemed culturally beneficial to society. However, its use can be less altruistic, as a means of suppressing embarrassing or controversial information. The ability to disseminate sensitive material quickly through the Internet concerns both State and non-State actors, and there are indications that through the use of private intermediaries, copyright can be used to suppress speech. This article shall seek to explain how the current neoliberal system of governance blurs the line between public and private actors, creating a diffused and decentralised system of copyright enforcement that allows for the suppression of speech in a way that avoids discussion of censorship.",
keywords = "copyright, neoliberalism, regulatory capitalism, freedom of expression, censorship, fair use, intermediaries",
author = "Benjamin Farrand",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/19331681.2013.843922",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "404--422",
journal = "Journal of Information Technology and Politics",
issn = "1933-1681",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulatory capitalism, decentred enforcement and its legal consequences for digital expression

T2 - Journal of Information Technology and Politics

AU - Farrand, Benjamin

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Copyright as currently understood is justified by the belief that the protection it grants to creators incentivises the continued creation of works deemed culturally beneficial to society. However, its use can be less altruistic, as a means of suppressing embarrassing or controversial information. The ability to disseminate sensitive material quickly through the Internet concerns both State and non-State actors, and there are indications that through the use of private intermediaries, copyright can be used to suppress speech. This article shall seek to explain how the current neoliberal system of governance blurs the line between public and private actors, creating a diffused and decentralised system of copyright enforcement that allows for the suppression of speech in a way that avoids discussion of censorship.

AB - Copyright as currently understood is justified by the belief that the protection it grants to creators incentivises the continued creation of works deemed culturally beneficial to society. However, its use can be less altruistic, as a means of suppressing embarrassing or controversial information. The ability to disseminate sensitive material quickly through the Internet concerns both State and non-State actors, and there are indications that through the use of private intermediaries, copyright can be used to suppress speech. This article shall seek to explain how the current neoliberal system of governance blurs the line between public and private actors, creating a diffused and decentralised system of copyright enforcement that allows for the suppression of speech in a way that avoids discussion of censorship.

KW - copyright

KW - neoliberalism

KW - regulatory capitalism

KW - freedom of expression

KW - censorship

KW - fair use

KW - intermediaries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889685253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19331681.2013.843922

DO - 10.1080/19331681.2013.843922

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 404

EP - 422

JO - Journal of Information Technology and Politics

JF - Journal of Information Technology and Politics

SN - 1933-1681

IS - 4

ER -