Regional subcultures and mass preferences regarding candidate traits in the US

Christopher J. Carman, David C. Barker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Regional variation in state orientations toward politics has long been a feature of the United States. Yet while this regional variation has received a great deal of empirical scrutiny at the aggregate level, finding clear and distinct differences in the adoption and implementation of policies across the states based on their dominant political subculture, there has been far less empirical scrutiny given to the underlying foundation of these policy differences—namely shared individual level orientations toward politics. In this brief paper we discuss the empirical evidence supporting the major classification of US political subcultures, that offered by Daniel Elazar. We then explore mass preferences regarding what types of personality traits are seen as most desirable for political candidates to hold – an important dimension in US presidential politics – finding clear regional variation across Elazar’s individualistic, moralistic and traditionalistic cultures.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)515-526
Number of pages12
JournalRegional and Federal Studies
Volume20
Issue number4-5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

subculture
regional difference
politics
candidacy
personality traits
evidence
policy

Keywords

  • political culture
  • candidate traits
  • Elazar
  • United States

Cite this

Carman, Christopher J. ; Barker, David C. / Regional subcultures and mass preferences regarding candidate traits in the US. In: Regional and Federal Studies. 2010 ; Vol. 20, No. 4-5. pp. 515-526.
@article{a7d2a5acc24040439a73006e4c790d60,
title = "Regional subcultures and mass preferences regarding candidate traits in the US",
abstract = "Regional variation in state orientations toward politics has long been a feature of the United States. Yet while this regional variation has received a great deal of empirical scrutiny at the aggregate level, finding clear and distinct differences in the adoption and implementation of policies across the states based on their dominant political subculture, there has been far less empirical scrutiny given to the underlying foundation of these policy differences—namely shared individual level orientations toward politics. In this brief paper we discuss the empirical evidence supporting the major classification of US political subcultures, that offered by Daniel Elazar. We then explore mass preferences regarding what types of personality traits are seen as most desirable for political candidates to hold – an important dimension in US presidential politics – finding clear regional variation across Elazar’s individualistic, moralistic and traditionalistic cultures.",
keywords = "political culture, candidate traits, Elazar, United States",
author = "Carman, {Christopher J.} and Barker, {David C.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/13597566.2010.523636",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "515--526",
journal = "Regional and Federal Studies",
issn = "1359-7566",
number = "4-5",

}

Regional subcultures and mass preferences regarding candidate traits in the US. / Carman, Christopher J.; Barker, David C.

In: Regional and Federal Studies, Vol. 20, No. 4-5, 2010, p. 515-526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regional subcultures and mass preferences regarding candidate traits in the US

AU - Carman, Christopher J.

AU - Barker, David C.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Regional variation in state orientations toward politics has long been a feature of the United States. Yet while this regional variation has received a great deal of empirical scrutiny at the aggregate level, finding clear and distinct differences in the adoption and implementation of policies across the states based on their dominant political subculture, there has been far less empirical scrutiny given to the underlying foundation of these policy differences—namely shared individual level orientations toward politics. In this brief paper we discuss the empirical evidence supporting the major classification of US political subcultures, that offered by Daniel Elazar. We then explore mass preferences regarding what types of personality traits are seen as most desirable for political candidates to hold – an important dimension in US presidential politics – finding clear regional variation across Elazar’s individualistic, moralistic and traditionalistic cultures.

AB - Regional variation in state orientations toward politics has long been a feature of the United States. Yet while this regional variation has received a great deal of empirical scrutiny at the aggregate level, finding clear and distinct differences in the adoption and implementation of policies across the states based on their dominant political subculture, there has been far less empirical scrutiny given to the underlying foundation of these policy differences—namely shared individual level orientations toward politics. In this brief paper we discuss the empirical evidence supporting the major classification of US political subcultures, that offered by Daniel Elazar. We then explore mass preferences regarding what types of personality traits are seen as most desirable for political candidates to hold – an important dimension in US presidential politics – finding clear regional variation across Elazar’s individualistic, moralistic and traditionalistic cultures.

KW - political culture

KW - candidate traits

KW - Elazar

KW - United States

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82455254483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13597566.2010.523636

DO - 10.1080/13597566.2010.523636

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 515

EP - 526

JO - Regional and Federal Studies

JF - Regional and Federal Studies

SN - 1359-7566

IS - 4-5

ER -