Regional governance in industrial regions in Central and Eastern Europe: case study of Moravia, Silesia and Upper Silesia

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

As we move further into the 21st century, the prominence of regions can no longer be taken for granted. A certain skepticism has developed with regard to the feasibility of marginal regions achieving self-sustained growth and states have maintained their role as regulators of economic and social activities. Thus, the notion of the region and its significance is currently much debated and contested. Illustrated with a wide range of European case studies, this volume brings together the main strands of these contestations, as economic, political and social actors attempt to institutionalise their vision of their region as the dominant form of territorial governance. It questions both the external delimitation and the internal constitution of regions and critically analyses the societal processes circumscribing ways in which regions are created, maintained and undermined. This chapter focuses on Moravia, Silesia and Upper Silesia.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRegionalism Contested: Institution, Society and Governance
Pages177-200
Number of pages23
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • regional governance
  • Central and Eastern Europe
  • Moravia
  • Silesia
  • Upper Silesia
  • structural funds
  • European Union
  • regions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regional governance in industrial regions in Central and Eastern Europe: case study of Moravia, Silesia and Upper Silesia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this