Reforming EU cohesion policy: a reappraisal of the performance of the structural funds

John Bachtler, G Gorzelak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to reassess the effectiveness of Cohesion policy. It examines the evidence for the performance of the policy since 1988, with a view to testing four main assumptions: that convergence is taking place at national and regional levels; that Cohesion policy has made a durable contribution to convergence and regional restructuring, in terms of GDP and employment; that Cohesion policy funds have been spent in the most effective way; and that there is a wider added value from Cohesion policy spending. The article goes on to consider issues for the budget review and how the effectiveness of Cohesion policy at the European level might be improved.
LanguageEnglish
Pages309-326
Number of pages18
JournalPolicy Studies
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Oct 2007

Fingerprint

group cohesion
EU
performance
value added
restructuring
budget
evidence

Keywords

  • performance
  • structural funds
  • cohesion policy

Cite this

@article{87911f745b9a413783889327aa0125e6,
title = "Reforming EU cohesion policy: a reappraisal of the performance of the structural funds",
abstract = "The aim of this article is to reassess the effectiveness of Cohesion policy. It examines the evidence for the performance of the policy since 1988, with a view to testing four main assumptions: that convergence is taking place at national and regional levels; that Cohesion policy has made a durable contribution to convergence and regional restructuring, in terms of GDP and employment; that Cohesion policy funds have been spent in the most effective way; and that there is a wider added value from Cohesion policy spending. The article goes on to consider issues for the budget review and how the effectiveness of Cohesion policy at the European level might be improved.",
keywords = "performance, structural funds, cohesion policy",
author = "John Bachtler and G Gorzelak",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1080/01442870701640682",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "309--326",
journal = "Policy Studies",
issn = "0144-2872",
number = "4",

}

Reforming EU cohesion policy : a reappraisal of the performance of the structural funds . / Bachtler, John; Gorzelak, G.

In: Policy Studies, Vol. 28, No. 4, 16.10.2007, p. 309-326.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reforming EU cohesion policy

T2 - Policy Studies

AU - Bachtler, John

AU - Gorzelak, G

PY - 2007/10/16

Y1 - 2007/10/16

N2 - The aim of this article is to reassess the effectiveness of Cohesion policy. It examines the evidence for the performance of the policy since 1988, with a view to testing four main assumptions: that convergence is taking place at national and regional levels; that Cohesion policy has made a durable contribution to convergence and regional restructuring, in terms of GDP and employment; that Cohesion policy funds have been spent in the most effective way; and that there is a wider added value from Cohesion policy spending. The article goes on to consider issues for the budget review and how the effectiveness of Cohesion policy at the European level might be improved.

AB - The aim of this article is to reassess the effectiveness of Cohesion policy. It examines the evidence for the performance of the policy since 1988, with a view to testing four main assumptions: that convergence is taking place at national and regional levels; that Cohesion policy has made a durable contribution to convergence and regional restructuring, in terms of GDP and employment; that Cohesion policy funds have been spent in the most effective way; and that there is a wider added value from Cohesion policy spending. The article goes on to consider issues for the budget review and how the effectiveness of Cohesion policy at the European level might be improved.

KW - performance

KW - structural funds

KW - cohesion policy

U2 - 10.1080/01442870701640682

DO - 10.1080/01442870701640682

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 309

EP - 326

JO - Policy Studies

JF - Policy Studies

SN - 0144-2872

IS - 4

ER -