Reflections on the pro-union and pro -independence contributions to the Fraser Economic Commentary and on proposals for enhanced devolution of economic powers to Scotland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This second paper briefly reflects on two specific contributions to the debate by representatives of each of the Referendum campaigns. They appeared in the FAI Economic Commentary, March 2014 Vol 37 (3): the first written by John Swinney, MSP, and the second by Professor Jim Gallagher. In particular, the paper considers the extent to which these two contributions address the challenges presented by the Six Tests, set out in Goudie (2013), with their emphasis on how effectively different constitutional propositions might stand up to the key economic challenges over the longer term. To date, the independence agenda has been articulated to a far greater degree than the agenda that might drive enhanced devolution within the union. The paper, therefore, turns to the propositions of enhanced devolution and some of the crucial issues that must be more systematically addressed in the event that this form of constitutional transformation is preferred in the Referendum.
LanguageEnglish
Pages68-75
Number of pages8
JournalFraser of Allander Economic Commentary
Volume38
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jun 2014

Fingerprint

Economics
Agenda
Devolution
Economic power
Scotland
Referendum

Keywords

  • Fraser of Allander
  • Scottish independence debate
  • Scottish independence referendum
  • pro-independence
  • pro-union

Cite this

@article{77d1f56c502343f08ccb57fcb5c26422,
title = "Reflections on the pro-union and pro -independence contributions to the Fraser Economic Commentary and on proposals for enhanced devolution of economic powers to Scotland",
abstract = "This second paper briefly reflects on two specific contributions to the debate by representatives of each of the Referendum campaigns. They appeared in the FAI Economic Commentary, March 2014 Vol 37 (3): the first written by John Swinney, MSP, and the second by Professor Jim Gallagher. In particular, the paper considers the extent to which these two contributions address the challenges presented by the Six Tests, set out in Goudie (2013), with their emphasis on how effectively different constitutional propositions might stand up to the key economic challenges over the longer term. To date, the independence agenda has been articulated to a far greater degree than the agenda that might drive enhanced devolution within the union. The paper, therefore, turns to the propositions of enhanced devolution and some of the crucial issues that must be more systematically addressed in the event that this form of constitutional transformation is preferred in the Referendum.",
keywords = "Fraser of Allander, Scottish independence debate, Scottish independence referendum, pro-independence, pro-union",
author = "Andrew Goudie",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "18",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "68--75",
journal = "Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary",
issn = "2046-5378",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflections on the pro-union and pro -independence contributions to the Fraser Economic Commentary and on proposals for enhanced devolution of economic powers to Scotland

AU - Goudie, Andrew

PY - 2014/6/18

Y1 - 2014/6/18

N2 - This second paper briefly reflects on two specific contributions to the debate by representatives of each of the Referendum campaigns. They appeared in the FAI Economic Commentary, March 2014 Vol 37 (3): the first written by John Swinney, MSP, and the second by Professor Jim Gallagher. In particular, the paper considers the extent to which these two contributions address the challenges presented by the Six Tests, set out in Goudie (2013), with their emphasis on how effectively different constitutional propositions might stand up to the key economic challenges over the longer term. To date, the independence agenda has been articulated to a far greater degree than the agenda that might drive enhanced devolution within the union. The paper, therefore, turns to the propositions of enhanced devolution and some of the crucial issues that must be more systematically addressed in the event that this form of constitutional transformation is preferred in the Referendum.

AB - This second paper briefly reflects on two specific contributions to the debate by representatives of each of the Referendum campaigns. They appeared in the FAI Economic Commentary, March 2014 Vol 37 (3): the first written by John Swinney, MSP, and the second by Professor Jim Gallagher. In particular, the paper considers the extent to which these two contributions address the challenges presented by the Six Tests, set out in Goudie (2013), with their emphasis on how effectively different constitutional propositions might stand up to the key economic challenges over the longer term. To date, the independence agenda has been articulated to a far greater degree than the agenda that might drive enhanced devolution within the union. The paper, therefore, turns to the propositions of enhanced devolution and some of the crucial issues that must be more systematically addressed in the event that this form of constitutional transformation is preferred in the Referendum.

KW - Fraser of Allander

KW - Scottish independence debate

KW - Scottish independence referendum

KW - pro-independence

KW - pro-union

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/fraser/

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/frasercommentary/

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 68

EP - 75

JO - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

T2 - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

JF - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

SN - 2046-5378

IS - 1

ER -