Reflections on motor development research across the 20th century

six empirical studies that changed the field

Jane E. Clark, Farid Bardid, Nancy Getchell, Leah E. Robinson, Nadja Schott, Jill Whitall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Motor development research has had a rich history over the 20th century with a wide array of scientists contributing to a broad and deep body of literature. Just like the process of development, progress within the field has been non-linear, with rapid periods of growth occurring after the publication of key research articles that changed how we conceptualized and explored motor development. These publications provided new ways to consider developmental issues and, as a result, ignited change in our theoretical and empirical approaches within the field of motor development and the broader field of developmental psychology. In this paper, we outline and discuss six pioneering studies that we consider significant in their impact and in the field's evolution, in order of publication: Halverson, 1931; Wild, 1938; Gibson & Walk, 1960; Connolly, Brown, & Bassett, 1968; Thelen & Fisher, 1982; Thelen & Ulrich, 1991. We have limited this review to empirical papers only. Together, they offer insight into what motor development research is, where it came from, why it matters, and what it has achieved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-26
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Motor Learning and Development
Early online date11 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Publications
20th Century History
Research
developmental psychology
Growth
history
Developmental Psychology

Keywords

  • motor development
  • research
  • developmental issues

Cite this

@article{537a837649e543bf95e20758d0b5c473,
title = "Reflections on motor development research across the 20th century: six empirical studies that changed the field",
abstract = "Motor development research has had a rich history over the 20th century with a wide array of scientists contributing to a broad and deep body of literature. Just like the process of development, progress within the field has been non-linear, with rapid periods of growth occurring after the publication of key research articles that changed how we conceptualized and explored motor development. These publications provided new ways to consider developmental issues and, as a result, ignited change in our theoretical and empirical approaches within the field of motor development and the broader field of developmental psychology. In this paper, we outline and discuss six pioneering studies that we consider significant in their impact and in the field's evolution, in order of publication: Halverson, 1931; Wild, 1938; Gibson & Walk, 1960; Connolly, Brown, & Bassett, 1968; Thelen & Fisher, 1982; Thelen & Ulrich, 1991. We have limited this review to empirical papers only. Together, they offer insight into what motor development research is, where it came from, why it matters, and what it has achieved.",
keywords = "motor development, research, developmental issues",
author = "Clark, {Jane E.} and Farid Bardid and Nancy Getchell and Robinson, {Leah E.} and Nadja Schott and Jill Whitall",
note = "Accepted author manuscript version reprinted, by permission, from Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 2019 (ahead of print). {\circledC} Human Kinetics, Inc.",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1123/jmld.2018-0031",
language = "English",
pages = "1--26",
journal = "Journal of Motor Learning and Development",
issn = "2325-3193",

}

Reflections on motor development research across the 20th century : six empirical studies that changed the field. / Clark, Jane E.; Bardid, Farid; Getchell, Nancy; Robinson, Leah E.; Schott, Nadja; Whitall, Jill.

In: Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 11.10.2019, p. 1-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflections on motor development research across the 20th century

T2 - six empirical studies that changed the field

AU - Clark, Jane E.

AU - Bardid, Farid

AU - Getchell, Nancy

AU - Robinson, Leah E.

AU - Schott, Nadja

AU - Whitall, Jill

N1 - Accepted author manuscript version reprinted, by permission, from Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 2019 (ahead of print). © Human Kinetics, Inc.

PY - 2019/10/11

Y1 - 2019/10/11

N2 - Motor development research has had a rich history over the 20th century with a wide array of scientists contributing to a broad and deep body of literature. Just like the process of development, progress within the field has been non-linear, with rapid periods of growth occurring after the publication of key research articles that changed how we conceptualized and explored motor development. These publications provided new ways to consider developmental issues and, as a result, ignited change in our theoretical and empirical approaches within the field of motor development and the broader field of developmental psychology. In this paper, we outline and discuss six pioneering studies that we consider significant in their impact and in the field's evolution, in order of publication: Halverson, 1931; Wild, 1938; Gibson & Walk, 1960; Connolly, Brown, & Bassett, 1968; Thelen & Fisher, 1982; Thelen & Ulrich, 1991. We have limited this review to empirical papers only. Together, they offer insight into what motor development research is, where it came from, why it matters, and what it has achieved.

AB - Motor development research has had a rich history over the 20th century with a wide array of scientists contributing to a broad and deep body of literature. Just like the process of development, progress within the field has been non-linear, with rapid periods of growth occurring after the publication of key research articles that changed how we conceptualized and explored motor development. These publications provided new ways to consider developmental issues and, as a result, ignited change in our theoretical and empirical approaches within the field of motor development and the broader field of developmental psychology. In this paper, we outline and discuss six pioneering studies that we consider significant in their impact and in the field's evolution, in order of publication: Halverson, 1931; Wild, 1938; Gibson & Walk, 1960; Connolly, Brown, & Bassett, 1968; Thelen & Fisher, 1982; Thelen & Ulrich, 1991. We have limited this review to empirical papers only. Together, they offer insight into what motor development research is, where it came from, why it matters, and what it has achieved.

KW - motor development

KW - research

KW - developmental issues

UR - https://journals.humankinetics.com/journal/jmld

U2 - 10.1123/jmld.2018-0031

DO - 10.1123/jmld.2018-0031

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 26

JO - Journal of Motor Learning and Development

JF - Journal of Motor Learning and Development

SN - 2325-3193

ER -