Reconsidering the calculation and role of environmental footprints

Janine De Fence, Christa Jensen, Stuart McIntyre, Max Munday, Karen Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Following the recent Copenhagen Climate Change conference, there has been discussion of the methods and underlying principles that inform climate change targets. Climate change targets following the Kyoto Protocol are broadly based on a production accounting principle (PAP). This approach focuses on emissions produced within given geographical boundaries. An alternative approach is a consumption accounting principle (CAP), where the focus is on emissions produced globally to meet consumption demand within the national (or regional) economy1. Increasingly popular environmental footprint measures, including ecological and carbon footprints, attempt to measure environmental impacts based on CAP methods. The perception that human consumption decisions lie at the heart of the climate change problem is the impetus driving pressure on policymakers for a more widespread use of CAP measures. At a global level of course, emissions accounted for under the production and consumption accounting principles would be equal. It is international trade that leads to differences in emissions under the two principles. This paper, the second in this special issue of the Fraser Commentary, examines how input-output accounting techniques may be applied to examine pollution generation under both of these accounting principles, focussing on waste and carbon generation in the Welsh economy as a case study. However, we take a different focus, arguing that the ‘domestic technology assumption’, taken as something of a mid-point in moving between production and consumption accounting in the first paper, may actually constitute a more useful focus for regional policymakers than full footprint analyses.
LanguageEnglish
Pages21-26
Number of pages6
JournalFraser of Allander Economic Commentary
VolumeSpecial Edition
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Climate change
Carbon footprint
International trade
Environmental impact
Pollution
Carbon
Accounting principles

Keywords

  • calculation
  • role
  • environmental footprints
  • production accounting principle
  • PAP
  • consumption accounting principle
  • CAP
  • emissions
  • international trade

Cite this

De Fence, Janine ; Jensen, Christa ; McIntyre, Stuart ; Munday, Max ; Turner, Karen. / Reconsidering the calculation and role of environmental footprints. In: Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary. 2011 ; Vol. Special Edition, No. 1. pp. 21-26.
@article{72e4514de166493c90d5b6b5c65d56ae,
title = "Reconsidering the calculation and role of environmental footprints",
abstract = "Following the recent Copenhagen Climate Change conference, there has been discussion of the methods and underlying principles that inform climate change targets. Climate change targets following the Kyoto Protocol are broadly based on a production accounting principle (PAP). This approach focuses on emissions produced within given geographical boundaries. An alternative approach is a consumption accounting principle (CAP), where the focus is on emissions produced globally to meet consumption demand within the national (or regional) economy1. Increasingly popular environmental footprint measures, including ecological and carbon footprints, attempt to measure environmental impacts based on CAP methods. The perception that human consumption decisions lie at the heart of the climate change problem is the impetus driving pressure on policymakers for a more widespread use of CAP measures. At a global level of course, emissions accounted for under the production and consumption accounting principles would be equal. It is international trade that leads to differences in emissions under the two principles. This paper, the second in this special issue of the Fraser Commentary, examines how input-output accounting techniques may be applied to examine pollution generation under both of these accounting principles, focussing on waste and carbon generation in the Welsh economy as a case study. However, we take a different focus, arguing that the ‘domestic technology assumption’, taken as something of a mid-point in moving between production and consumption accounting in the first paper, may actually constitute a more useful focus for regional policymakers than full footprint analyses.",
keywords = "calculation, role, environmental footprints, production accounting principle, PAP, consumption accounting principle, CAP, emissions, international trade",
author = "{De Fence}, Janine and Christa Jensen and Stuart McIntyre and Max Munday and Karen Turner",
note = "Published in the {"}Special Edition: Energy and Pollution{"} as part of the Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary.",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "Special Edition",
pages = "21--26",
journal = "Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary",
issn = "2046-5378",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
number = "1",

}

Reconsidering the calculation and role of environmental footprints. / De Fence, Janine; Jensen, Christa; McIntyre, Stuart; Munday, Max; Turner, Karen.

In: Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary, Vol. Special Edition, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 21-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconsidering the calculation and role of environmental footprints

AU - De Fence, Janine

AU - Jensen, Christa

AU - McIntyre, Stuart

AU - Munday, Max

AU - Turner, Karen

N1 - Published in the "Special Edition: Energy and Pollution" as part of the Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary.

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Following the recent Copenhagen Climate Change conference, there has been discussion of the methods and underlying principles that inform climate change targets. Climate change targets following the Kyoto Protocol are broadly based on a production accounting principle (PAP). This approach focuses on emissions produced within given geographical boundaries. An alternative approach is a consumption accounting principle (CAP), where the focus is on emissions produced globally to meet consumption demand within the national (or regional) economy1. Increasingly popular environmental footprint measures, including ecological and carbon footprints, attempt to measure environmental impacts based on CAP methods. The perception that human consumption decisions lie at the heart of the climate change problem is the impetus driving pressure on policymakers for a more widespread use of CAP measures. At a global level of course, emissions accounted for under the production and consumption accounting principles would be equal. It is international trade that leads to differences in emissions under the two principles. This paper, the second in this special issue of the Fraser Commentary, examines how input-output accounting techniques may be applied to examine pollution generation under both of these accounting principles, focussing on waste and carbon generation in the Welsh economy as a case study. However, we take a different focus, arguing that the ‘domestic technology assumption’, taken as something of a mid-point in moving between production and consumption accounting in the first paper, may actually constitute a more useful focus for regional policymakers than full footprint analyses.

AB - Following the recent Copenhagen Climate Change conference, there has been discussion of the methods and underlying principles that inform climate change targets. Climate change targets following the Kyoto Protocol are broadly based on a production accounting principle (PAP). This approach focuses on emissions produced within given geographical boundaries. An alternative approach is a consumption accounting principle (CAP), where the focus is on emissions produced globally to meet consumption demand within the national (or regional) economy1. Increasingly popular environmental footprint measures, including ecological and carbon footprints, attempt to measure environmental impacts based on CAP methods. The perception that human consumption decisions lie at the heart of the climate change problem is the impetus driving pressure on policymakers for a more widespread use of CAP measures. At a global level of course, emissions accounted for under the production and consumption accounting principles would be equal. It is international trade that leads to differences in emissions under the two principles. This paper, the second in this special issue of the Fraser Commentary, examines how input-output accounting techniques may be applied to examine pollution generation under both of these accounting principles, focussing on waste and carbon generation in the Welsh economy as a case study. However, we take a different focus, arguing that the ‘domestic technology assumption’, taken as something of a mid-point in moving between production and consumption accounting in the first paper, may actually constitute a more useful focus for regional policymakers than full footprint analyses.

KW - calculation

KW - role

KW - environmental footprints

KW - production accounting principle

KW - PAP

KW - consumption accounting principle

KW - CAP

KW - emissions

KW - international trade

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/fraser/

M3 - Article

VL - Special Edition

SP - 21

EP - 26

JO - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

T2 - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

JF - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

SN - 2046-5378

IS - 1

ER -