Rebellion against Reason? A Study of Expressive Choice and Strikes

Christa N. Brunnschweiler, Colin Jennings, Ian MacKenzie

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper we challenge the conventional view that strikes are caused by asymmetric information regarding firm profitability such that union members are uninformed. Instead, we build an expressive model of strikes where the perception of unfairness provides the expressive benefit of voting for a strike. The model predicts that larger union size increases both wage offers and the incidence of strikes. Furthermore, while asymmetric information is still important in causing strikes, we find that it is the employer who is not fully informed about the level of emotionality within the union, thereby contributing to strike incidence. An empirical test using UK data provides support for the predictions. In particular, union size has a positive effect on the incidence of strikes and other industrial actions even when asymmetric information regarding profitability is controlled for.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationGlasgow
PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
Pages1-24
Number of pages25
Volume12
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Rebellion
Asymmetric information
Employers
Wages
Firm profitability
Prediction
Voting
Empirical test
Profitability

Keywords

  • strikes
  • fairness
  • expressive voting

Cite this

Brunnschweiler, C. N., Jennings, C., & MacKenzie, I. (2012). Rebellion against Reason? A Study of Expressive Choice and Strikes. (05 ed.) (pp. 1-24). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
Brunnschweiler, Christa N. ; Jennings, Colin ; MacKenzie, Ian. / Rebellion against Reason? A Study of Expressive Choice and Strikes. 05. ed. Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2012. pp. 1-24
@techreport{bc8e0e08ffe54de280491b693968ecb6,
title = "Rebellion against Reason? A Study of Expressive Choice and Strikes",
abstract = "In this paper we challenge the conventional view that strikes are caused by asymmetric information regarding firm profitability such that union members are uninformed. Instead, we build an expressive model of strikes where the perception of unfairness provides the expressive benefit of voting for a strike. The model predicts that larger union size increases both wage offers and the incidence of strikes. Furthermore, while asymmetric information is still important in causing strikes, we find that it is the employer who is not fully informed about the level of emotionality within the union, thereby contributing to strike incidence. An empirical test using UK data provides support for the predictions. In particular, union size has a positive effect on the incidence of strikes and other industrial actions even when asymmetric information regarding profitability is controlled for.",
keywords = "strikes, fairness, expressive voting",
author = "Brunnschweiler, {Christa N.} and Colin Jennings and Ian MacKenzie",
note = "Published as a paper within the Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 12-05 (2012)",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1--24",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
edition = "05",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "University of Strathclyde",

}

Brunnschweiler, CN, Jennings, C & MacKenzie, I 2012 'Rebellion against Reason? A Study of Expressive Choice and Strikes' 05 edn, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, pp. 1-24.

Rebellion against Reason? A Study of Expressive Choice and Strikes. / Brunnschweiler, Christa N.; Jennings, Colin; MacKenzie, Ian.

05. ed. Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2012. p. 1-24.

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Rebellion against Reason? A Study of Expressive Choice and Strikes

AU - Brunnschweiler, Christa N.

AU - Jennings, Colin

AU - MacKenzie, Ian

N1 - Published as a paper within the Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 12-05 (2012)

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In this paper we challenge the conventional view that strikes are caused by asymmetric information regarding firm profitability such that union members are uninformed. Instead, we build an expressive model of strikes where the perception of unfairness provides the expressive benefit of voting for a strike. The model predicts that larger union size increases both wage offers and the incidence of strikes. Furthermore, while asymmetric information is still important in causing strikes, we find that it is the employer who is not fully informed about the level of emotionality within the union, thereby contributing to strike incidence. An empirical test using UK data provides support for the predictions. In particular, union size has a positive effect on the incidence of strikes and other industrial actions even when asymmetric information regarding profitability is controlled for.

AB - In this paper we challenge the conventional view that strikes are caused by asymmetric information regarding firm profitability such that union members are uninformed. Instead, we build an expressive model of strikes where the perception of unfairness provides the expressive benefit of voting for a strike. The model predicts that larger union size increases both wage offers and the incidence of strikes. Furthermore, while asymmetric information is still important in causing strikes, we find that it is the employer who is not fully informed about the level of emotionality within the union, thereby contributing to strike incidence. An empirical test using UK data provides support for the predictions. In particular, union size has a positive effect on the incidence of strikes and other industrial actions even when asymmetric information regarding profitability is controlled for.

KW - strikes

KW - fairness

KW - expressive voting

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 12

SP - 1

EP - 24

BT - Rebellion against Reason? A Study of Expressive Choice and Strikes

PB - University of Strathclyde

CY - Glasgow

ER -

Brunnschweiler CN, Jennings C, MacKenzie I. Rebellion against Reason? A Study of Expressive Choice and Strikes. 05 ed. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde. 2012, p. 1-24.