Reasoning maps for decision aid: an integrated approach for problem-structuring and multi-criteria evaluation

F. Ackermann, V. Belton, L. Ensslin, G. Montibeller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper proposes a tool for multi-criteria decision aid to be referred to as a reasoning map. It is motivated by a desire to provide an integrated approach to problem structuring and evaluation, and in particular, to make the transition between these two processes a natural and seamless progression. The approach has two phases. In the first one, the building of a reasoning map supports problem structuring, capturing a decision maker's reasoning as a network of means and ends concepts. In the second phase, this map is enhanced, employing a user-defined qualitative scale to measure both performances of decision options and strengths of influence for each means-end link. This latter phase supports the decision maker in evaluating the positive and negative impacts of an action through synthesis of the qualitative information. A case study, which investigates the use of the method in practice, is also presented.
LanguageEnglish
Pages575-589
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of the Operational Research Society
Volume59
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Problem structuring
Decision aids
Multi-criteria evaluation
Integrated approach
Decision maker
Performance measures
Progression
Multicriteria decision aid
Evaluation

Keywords

  • reasoning maps
  • decision aids
  • problem-structuring
  • multi-criteria evaluation

Cite this

@article{6a2611fac8d54271b4ee7bdb5c2cf6a9,
title = "Reasoning maps for decision aid: an integrated approach for problem-structuring and multi-criteria evaluation",
abstract = "This paper proposes a tool for multi-criteria decision aid to be referred to as a reasoning map. It is motivated by a desire to provide an integrated approach to problem structuring and evaluation, and in particular, to make the transition between these two processes a natural and seamless progression. The approach has two phases. In the first one, the building of a reasoning map supports problem structuring, capturing a decision maker's reasoning as a network of means and ends concepts. In the second phase, this map is enhanced, employing a user-defined qualitative scale to measure both performances of decision options and strengths of influence for each means-end link. This latter phase supports the decision maker in evaluating the positive and negative impacts of an action through synthesis of the qualitative information. A case study, which investigates the use of the method in practice, is also presented.",
keywords = "reasoning maps, decision aids, problem-structuring, multi-criteria evaluation",
author = "F. Ackermann and V. Belton and L. Ensslin and G. Montibeller",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602347",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "575--589",
journal = "Journal of Operational Research Society",
issn = "0160-5682",
number = "5",

}

Reasoning maps for decision aid: an integrated approach for problem-structuring and multi-criteria evaluation. / Ackermann, F.; Belton, V.; Ensslin, L.; Montibeller, G.

In: Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 59, No. 5, 2007, p. 575-589.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reasoning maps for decision aid: an integrated approach for problem-structuring and multi-criteria evaluation

AU - Ackermann, F.

AU - Belton, V.

AU - Ensslin, L.

AU - Montibeller, G.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This paper proposes a tool for multi-criteria decision aid to be referred to as a reasoning map. It is motivated by a desire to provide an integrated approach to problem structuring and evaluation, and in particular, to make the transition between these two processes a natural and seamless progression. The approach has two phases. In the first one, the building of a reasoning map supports problem structuring, capturing a decision maker's reasoning as a network of means and ends concepts. In the second phase, this map is enhanced, employing a user-defined qualitative scale to measure both performances of decision options and strengths of influence for each means-end link. This latter phase supports the decision maker in evaluating the positive and negative impacts of an action through synthesis of the qualitative information. A case study, which investigates the use of the method in practice, is also presented.

AB - This paper proposes a tool for multi-criteria decision aid to be referred to as a reasoning map. It is motivated by a desire to provide an integrated approach to problem structuring and evaluation, and in particular, to make the transition between these two processes a natural and seamless progression. The approach has two phases. In the first one, the building of a reasoning map supports problem structuring, capturing a decision maker's reasoning as a network of means and ends concepts. In the second phase, this map is enhanced, employing a user-defined qualitative scale to measure both performances of decision options and strengths of influence for each means-end link. This latter phase supports the decision maker in evaluating the positive and negative impacts of an action through synthesis of the qualitative information. A case study, which investigates the use of the method in practice, is also presented.

KW - reasoning maps

KW - decision aids

KW - problem-structuring

KW - multi-criteria evaluation

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602347

U2 - 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602347

DO - 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602347

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 575

EP - 589

JO - Journal of Operational Research Society

T2 - Journal of Operational Research Society

JF - Journal of Operational Research Society

SN - 0160-5682

IS - 5

ER -