Projects per year
This chapter maps little-studied interactions between public and private international law by comparing experiences in using private contracts to specify the meaning of international environmental treaty objectives that relate to equity (namely, fair and equitable benefit-sharing). In particular, the chapter contrasts two possible approaches in relying on private contracts: a bilateral approach – that is, reliance on ad hoc contracts under the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit-sharing (ABS) under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) – and a multilateral approach, namely reliance on standardised contractual clauses that have been developed intergovernmentally under the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (International Treaty). In both cases, private contracts have played a key role in specifying the meaning of certain obligations that were left vague in the treaty text in relation to the objective of equity.
|Title of host publication||Linkages and Boundaries in Private and Public International Law|
|Editors||Veronica Ruiz Abou-Nigm , Kasey McCall-Smith , Duncan French|
|Place of Publication||London|
|Number of pages||17|
|Publication status||Published - 26 Jul 2018|
- international law
- private contracts
- environmental treaties
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Realising the objectives of public international environmental law through private contracts: the need for a dialogue with private international law scholars'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- 1 Finished
1/07/16 → 31/10/18
- 1 Article
Fair and equitable benefit-sharing in a new treaty on marine biodiversity: a principled approach towards partnership building?Morgera, E., 3 Dec 2018, In: Maritime Safety and Security Law Journal. 5, p. 48-77 30 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-reviewOpen AccessFile
- 1 Invited talk