Real-time teleprotection testing using IP/MPLS over xDSL

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

Abstract

Teleprotection for power systems is safety-critical and has demanding requirements for bandwidth, low latency, and low jitter. Traditionally, time-division multiplexing (TDM) using SONET/SDH circuits has been used to provide this quality of service. Modern packet-based networks offer several advantages, such as improved flexibility and greater bandwidth efficiency. With IP/MPLS, packet-based networks can cater for teleprotection functionality.

This report demonstrates the potential for commercially-available IP/MPLS hardware to provide teleprotection functionality over two DSL technologies, VDSL and SHDSL. A real-time hardware in the loop environment has been developed to test these schemes under a variety of scenarios, which are indicative of real-world conditions. Commercially-available protection relays were used to implement C37.94-based communications, and the stability of the protection functions were monitored closely during the testing.

The results highlight the maximum DSL line distance and the remaining bandwidth (after provisioning for the teleprotection) which can be achieved, whilst observing a 6 ms propagation delay restriction.

VDSL is only suitable for links up to approximately 1.4 km, although it can deliver relatively high bandwidth of 4-19 Mbps, depending on the line distance.

SHDSL can support up to 4-5 km per span. Distances of approximately 4.3 km offer a good compromise of distance, delay, and remaining bandwidth. Using two serially-connected SHDSL spans is beneficial: it can support either longer distances, or provide greater spare bandwidth.

The number of C37.94 slots used for teleprotection should be greater than 4, where possible, to help reduce the propagation delay. Each DSL modem type “favours” particular MPLS payload sizes, and these values provide the best compromises in connection distance, delay, and remaining bandwidth – as well as ensuring that the protection scheme remains stable.
LanguageEnglish
Place of PublicationGlasgow
PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
Number of pages18
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Bandwidth
DSL
Testing
Hardware
Relay protection
Time division multiplexing
Modems
Jitter
Security systems
Quality of service
Networks (circuits)
Communication

Keywords

  • real-time
  • teleprotection testing
  • ip/mpls
  • xdsl

Cite this

@book{4e0e68f39e234f7e802df5bc02d20127,
title = "Real-time teleprotection testing using IP/MPLS over xDSL",
abstract = "Teleprotection for power systems is safety-critical and has demanding requirements for bandwidth, low latency, and low jitter. Traditionally, time-division multiplexing (TDM) using SONET/SDH circuits has been used to provide this quality of service. Modern packet-based networks offer several advantages, such as improved flexibility and greater bandwidth efficiency. With IP/MPLS, packet-based networks can cater for teleprotection functionality.This report demonstrates the potential for commercially-available IP/MPLS hardware to provide teleprotection functionality over two DSL technologies, VDSL and SHDSL. A real-time hardware in the loop environment has been developed to test these schemes under a variety of scenarios, which are indicative of real-world conditions. Commercially-available protection relays were used to implement C37.94-based communications, and the stability of the protection functions were monitored closely during the testing.The results highlight the maximum DSL line distance and the remaining bandwidth (after provisioning for the teleprotection) which can be achieved, whilst observing a 6 ms propagation delay restriction.VDSL is only suitable for links up to approximately 1.4 km, although it can deliver relatively high bandwidth of 4-19 Mbps, depending on the line distance.SHDSL can support up to 4-5 km per span. Distances of approximately 4.3 km offer a good compromise of distance, delay, and remaining bandwidth. Using two serially-connected SHDSL spans is beneficial: it can support either longer distances, or provide greater spare bandwidth.The number of C37.94 slots used for teleprotection should be greater than 4, where possible, to help reduce the propagation delay. Each DSL modem type “favours” particular MPLS payload sizes, and these values provide the best compromises in connection distance, delay, and remaining bandwidth – as well as ensuring that the protection scheme remains stable.",
keywords = "real-time, teleprotection testing, ip/mpls, xdsl",
author = "Blair, {Steven Macpherson} and Campbell Booth",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",

}

Real-time teleprotection testing using IP/MPLS over xDSL. / Blair, Steven Macpherson; Booth, Campbell.

Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2013. 18 p.

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

TY - BOOK

T1 - Real-time teleprotection testing using IP/MPLS over xDSL

AU - Blair, Steven Macpherson

AU - Booth, Campbell

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Teleprotection for power systems is safety-critical and has demanding requirements for bandwidth, low latency, and low jitter. Traditionally, time-division multiplexing (TDM) using SONET/SDH circuits has been used to provide this quality of service. Modern packet-based networks offer several advantages, such as improved flexibility and greater bandwidth efficiency. With IP/MPLS, packet-based networks can cater for teleprotection functionality.This report demonstrates the potential for commercially-available IP/MPLS hardware to provide teleprotection functionality over two DSL technologies, VDSL and SHDSL. A real-time hardware in the loop environment has been developed to test these schemes under a variety of scenarios, which are indicative of real-world conditions. Commercially-available protection relays were used to implement C37.94-based communications, and the stability of the protection functions were monitored closely during the testing.The results highlight the maximum DSL line distance and the remaining bandwidth (after provisioning for the teleprotection) which can be achieved, whilst observing a 6 ms propagation delay restriction.VDSL is only suitable for links up to approximately 1.4 km, although it can deliver relatively high bandwidth of 4-19 Mbps, depending on the line distance.SHDSL can support up to 4-5 km per span. Distances of approximately 4.3 km offer a good compromise of distance, delay, and remaining bandwidth. Using two serially-connected SHDSL spans is beneficial: it can support either longer distances, or provide greater spare bandwidth.The number of C37.94 slots used for teleprotection should be greater than 4, where possible, to help reduce the propagation delay. Each DSL modem type “favours” particular MPLS payload sizes, and these values provide the best compromises in connection distance, delay, and remaining bandwidth – as well as ensuring that the protection scheme remains stable.

AB - Teleprotection for power systems is safety-critical and has demanding requirements for bandwidth, low latency, and low jitter. Traditionally, time-division multiplexing (TDM) using SONET/SDH circuits has been used to provide this quality of service. Modern packet-based networks offer several advantages, such as improved flexibility and greater bandwidth efficiency. With IP/MPLS, packet-based networks can cater for teleprotection functionality.This report demonstrates the potential for commercially-available IP/MPLS hardware to provide teleprotection functionality over two DSL technologies, VDSL and SHDSL. A real-time hardware in the loop environment has been developed to test these schemes under a variety of scenarios, which are indicative of real-world conditions. Commercially-available protection relays were used to implement C37.94-based communications, and the stability of the protection functions were monitored closely during the testing.The results highlight the maximum DSL line distance and the remaining bandwidth (after provisioning for the teleprotection) which can be achieved, whilst observing a 6 ms propagation delay restriction.VDSL is only suitable for links up to approximately 1.4 km, although it can deliver relatively high bandwidth of 4-19 Mbps, depending on the line distance.SHDSL can support up to 4-5 km per span. Distances of approximately 4.3 km offer a good compromise of distance, delay, and remaining bandwidth. Using two serially-connected SHDSL spans is beneficial: it can support either longer distances, or provide greater spare bandwidth.The number of C37.94 slots used for teleprotection should be greater than 4, where possible, to help reduce the propagation delay. Each DSL modem type “favours” particular MPLS payload sizes, and these values provide the best compromises in connection distance, delay, and remaining bandwidth – as well as ensuring that the protection scheme remains stable.

KW - real-time

KW - teleprotection testing

KW - ip/mpls

KW - xdsl

M3 - Commissioned report

BT - Real-time teleprotection testing using IP/MPLS over xDSL

PB - University of Strathclyde

CY - Glasgow

ER -

Blair SM, Booth C. Real-time teleprotection testing using IP/MPLS over xDSL. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, 2013. 18 p.