Reaction to 'An approach to perform expert elicitation for engineering design risk analysis : methodology and experimental results'

Taposhri Ganguly, Kevin Wilson, John Quigley, Roger Cooke, Alessandra Babuscia, Kar-Ming Cheung

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
322 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This letter a. rectifies misrepresentations of the classical model b. identifies methodological shortcomings in the authors's approach and c. compares performance of the authors' "calibration weighting" with equal weights and global weights of the classical model on the large expert judgement data set made available in (Cooke and Goossens 2008)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)981-985
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A
Volume177
Issue number4
Early online date15 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2014

Keywords

  • reaction
  • expert elicitation
  • engineering
  • methodology
  • design risk analysis
  • experimental results

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reaction to 'An approach to perform expert elicitation for engineering design risk analysis : methodology and experimental results''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this