Reaction to 'An approach to perform expert elicitation for engineering design risk analysis: methodology and experimental results'

Taposhri Ganguly, Kevin Wilson, John Quigley, Roger Cooke, Alessandra Babuscia, Kar-Ming Cheung

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

This letter a. rectifies misrepresentations of the classical model b. identifies methodological shortcomings in the authors's approach and c. compares performance of the authors' "calibration weighting" with equal weights and global weights of the classical model on the large expert judgement data set made available in (Cooke and Goossens 2008)
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A
Early online date15 Jul 2014
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Elicitation
Risk Analysis
Risk analysis
Engineering Design
expert
engineering
Expert Judgment
Methodology
methodology
Experimental Results
weighting
Weighting
Calibration
Model
performance
Engineering design
Expert elicitation
Expert judgment
Misrepresentation

Keywords

  • reaction
  • expert elicitation
  • engineering
  • methodology
  • design risk analysis
  • experimental results

Cite this

@article{ea416ebb050c4e8eb59e8a3e14372eb9,
title = "Reaction to 'An approach to perform expert elicitation for engineering design risk analysis: methodology and experimental results'",
abstract = "This letter a. rectifies misrepresentations of the classical model b. identifies methodological shortcomings in the authors's approach and c. compares performance of the authors' {"}calibration weighting{"} with equal weights and global weights of the classical model on the large expert judgement data set made available in (Cooke and Goossens 2008)",
keywords = "reaction, expert elicitation, engineering, methodology, design risk analysis, experimental results",
author = "Taposhri Ganguly and Kevin Wilson and John Quigley and Roger Cooke and Alessandra Babuscia and Kar-Ming Cheung",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/rssa.12070",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A",
issn = "0964-1998",

}

Reaction to 'An approach to perform expert elicitation for engineering design risk analysis: methodology and experimental results'. / Ganguly, Taposhri; Wilson, Kevin; Quigley, John; Cooke, Roger; Babuscia, Alessandra; Cheung, Kar-Ming.

In: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A , 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reaction to 'An approach to perform expert elicitation for engineering design risk analysis: methodology and experimental results'

AU - Ganguly,Taposhri

AU - Wilson,Kevin

AU - Quigley,John

AU - Cooke,Roger

AU - Babuscia,Alessandra

AU - Cheung,Kar-Ming

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This letter a. rectifies misrepresentations of the classical model b. identifies methodological shortcomings in the authors's approach and c. compares performance of the authors' "calibration weighting" with equal weights and global weights of the classical model on the large expert judgement data set made available in (Cooke and Goossens 2008)

AB - This letter a. rectifies misrepresentations of the classical model b. identifies methodological shortcomings in the authors's approach and c. compares performance of the authors' "calibration weighting" with equal weights and global weights of the classical model on the large expert judgement data set made available in (Cooke and Goossens 2008)

KW - reaction

KW - expert elicitation

KW - engineering

KW - methodology

KW - design risk analysis

KW - experimental results

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rssa.12070/abstract

U2 - 10.1111/rssa.12070

DO - 10.1111/rssa.12070

M3 - Letter

JO - Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A

T2 - Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A

JF - Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A

SN - 0964-1998

ER -