Reaction to 'An approach to perform expert elicitation for engineering design risk analysis: methodology and experimental results'

Taposhri Ganguly, Kevin Wilson, John Quigley, Roger Cooke, Alessandra Babuscia, Kar-Ming Cheung

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

1 Citation (Scopus)
324 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This letter a. rectifies misrepresentations of the classical model b. identifies methodological shortcomings in the authors's approach and c. compares performance of the authors' "calibration weighting" with equal weights and global weights of the classical model on the large expert judgement data set made available in (Cooke and Goossens 2008)
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A
Early online date15 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • reaction
  • expert elicitation
  • engineering
  • methodology
  • design risk analysis
  • experimental results

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reaction to 'An approach to perform expert elicitation for engineering design risk analysis: methodology and experimental results''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this