Abstract
This letter a. rectifies misrepresentations of the classical model b. identifies methodological shortcomings in the authors's approach and c. compares performance of the authors' "calibration weighting" with equal weights and global weights of the classical model on the large expert judgement data set made available in (Cooke and Goossens 2008)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 981-985 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A |
Volume | 177 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 15 Jul 2014 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2014 |
Keywords
- reaction
- expert elicitation
- engineering
- methodology
- design risk analysis
- experimental results