Ranganathan's relevance in the 21st century

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

S.R. Ranganathan had yet to publish his Five Laws of Library Science when this journal began its life 80 years ago, however in any period where one is reflecting on the history of a journal focused on library science it would be remiss not to focus on the five laws that have inspired our profession for almost the same period. Yet I have to confess to being one of those librarians who, having gained my Masters in the mid 1990s, was given very little exposure to the teachings of S.R. Ranganathan. Of course having worked in a large library for many years before qualifying professionally I was aware of his name, especially from the more mature librarians who held his creed close to their professional hearts. I also knew of his five laws, but I had never really studied them closely, nor had occasion to read any of his wider writings on librarianship. More importantly the dated language in Ranganathan's Five Laws was off-putting to me, and as such I had neither occasion nor great desire to reflect on them in my early career. Perhaps this was because I met several librarians who used the language used by Ranganathan to reinforce their own prejudices that we should focus our energies on books and ignore new technologies. Faced with this mindset from some colleagues I asked myself what exactly the five laws offered the librarian in the 21st century.
LanguageEnglish
Pages97-101
Number of pages4
JournalLibrary Review
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

librarian
Law
librarianship
language
science
prejudice
new technology
profession
career
energy
Teaching
history

Keywords

  • library history
  • librarianship
  • library and information science

Cite this

@article{29450bd441b24a4699b84be73f518bee,
title = "Ranganathan's relevance in the 21st century",
abstract = "S.R. Ranganathan had yet to publish his Five Laws of Library Science when this journal began its life 80 years ago, however in any period where one is reflecting on the history of a journal focused on library science it would be remiss not to focus on the five laws that have inspired our profession for almost the same period. Yet I have to confess to being one of those librarians who, having gained my Masters in the mid 1990s, was given very little exposure to the teachings of S.R. Ranganathan. Of course having worked in a large library for many years before qualifying professionally I was aware of his name, especially from the more mature librarians who held his creed close to their professional hearts. I also knew of his five laws, but I had never really studied them closely, nor had occasion to read any of his wider writings on librarianship. More importantly the dated language in Ranganathan's Five Laws was off-putting to me, and as such I had neither occasion nor great desire to reflect on them in my early career. Perhaps this was because I met several librarians who used the language used by Ranganathan to reinforce their own prejudices that we should focus our energies on books and ignore new technologies. Faced with this mindset from some colleagues I asked myself what exactly the five laws offered the librarian in the 21st century.",
keywords = "library history, librarianship, library and information science",
author = "D. McMenemy",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1108/00242530710730268",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "97--101",
journal = "Library Review",
issn = "0024-2535",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "2",

}

Ranganathan's relevance in the 21st century. / McMenemy, D.

In: Library Review, Vol. 56, No. 2, 2007, p. 97-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ranganathan's relevance in the 21st century

AU - McMenemy, D.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - S.R. Ranganathan had yet to publish his Five Laws of Library Science when this journal began its life 80 years ago, however in any period where one is reflecting on the history of a journal focused on library science it would be remiss not to focus on the five laws that have inspired our profession for almost the same period. Yet I have to confess to being one of those librarians who, having gained my Masters in the mid 1990s, was given very little exposure to the teachings of S.R. Ranganathan. Of course having worked in a large library for many years before qualifying professionally I was aware of his name, especially from the more mature librarians who held his creed close to their professional hearts. I also knew of his five laws, but I had never really studied them closely, nor had occasion to read any of his wider writings on librarianship. More importantly the dated language in Ranganathan's Five Laws was off-putting to me, and as such I had neither occasion nor great desire to reflect on them in my early career. Perhaps this was because I met several librarians who used the language used by Ranganathan to reinforce their own prejudices that we should focus our energies on books and ignore new technologies. Faced with this mindset from some colleagues I asked myself what exactly the five laws offered the librarian in the 21st century.

AB - S.R. Ranganathan had yet to publish his Five Laws of Library Science when this journal began its life 80 years ago, however in any period where one is reflecting on the history of a journal focused on library science it would be remiss not to focus on the five laws that have inspired our profession for almost the same period. Yet I have to confess to being one of those librarians who, having gained my Masters in the mid 1990s, was given very little exposure to the teachings of S.R. Ranganathan. Of course having worked in a large library for many years before qualifying professionally I was aware of his name, especially from the more mature librarians who held his creed close to their professional hearts. I also knew of his five laws, but I had never really studied them closely, nor had occasion to read any of his wider writings on librarianship. More importantly the dated language in Ranganathan's Five Laws was off-putting to me, and as such I had neither occasion nor great desire to reflect on them in my early career. Perhaps this was because I met several librarians who used the language used by Ranganathan to reinforce their own prejudices that we should focus our energies on books and ignore new technologies. Faced with this mindset from some colleagues I asked myself what exactly the five laws offered the librarian in the 21st century.

KW - library history

KW - librarianship

KW - library and information science

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530710730268

U2 - 10.1108/00242530710730268

DO - 10.1108/00242530710730268

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 97

EP - 101

JO - Library Review

T2 - Library Review

JF - Library Review

SN - 0024-2535

IS - 2

ER -