Randomized trial of continuous nasogastic, bolus nasogastric, and transpyloric feeding in infants of birth-weight under 1400-g

P.D. Macdonald, C.H. Skeoch, H. Carse, F. Dryburgh, L.G. Alroomi, P. Galea, G. Gettinby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Forty three infants under 1400 g were fed by a bolus nasogastric, continuous nasogastric, or transpyloric route. There were more complications with transpyloric feeding and no identifiable benefits in the growth rate, oral energy input, or chosen biochemical indices of nutrition. Bolus or continuous nasogastric feeds rather than transpyloric are better routine methods in infants of low birth weight.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)429-431
Number of pages2
JournalArchives of Disease in Childhood
Volume67
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1992

Keywords

  • continuous nasogastric
  • bolus nasogastric
  • transpyloric feeding
  • infants
  • transpyloric route
  • low birth weight

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized trial of continuous nasogastic, bolus nasogastric, and transpyloric feeding in infants of birth-weight under 1400-g'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this