R. (on the application of UNISON) v Lord Chancellor: a masterclass in the constitutional right of access to the courts

Emily Rose

R. (on the application of UNISON) v Lord Chancellor: a masterclass in the constitutional right of access to the courts

Emily Rose

Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

42 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Reports on the significance of R. (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor (SC) that the Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013 was unlawful under both domestic and EU law as it effectively prevented access to justice.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	261-267
Number of pages	7
Journal	Juridical Review
Volume	2017
Issue number	4
Publication status	Published - 31 Dec 2017

Keywords

access to justice
employment tribunals
fees

Access to Document

Rose-JR-2017-a-masterclass-in-the-constitutional-right-of-access-to-the-courtsAccepted author manuscript, 439 KB

Cite this

@article{0417353d80104f25bb1a0565dfe41d9d,

title = "R. (on the application of UNISON) v Lord Chancellor: a masterclass in the constitutional right of access to the courts",

abstract = "Reports on the significance of R. (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor (SC) that the Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013 was unlawful under both domestic and EU law as it effectively prevented access to justice.",

keywords = "access to justice, employment tribunals, fees",

author = "Emily Rose",

year = "2017",

month = dec,

day = "31",

language = "English",

volume = "2017",

pages = "261--267",

journal = "Juridical Review",

issn = "0022-6785",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - R. (on the application of UNISON) v Lord Chancellor

T2 - a masterclass in the constitutional right of access to the courts

AU - Rose, Emily

PY - 2017/12/31

Y1 - 2017/12/31

N2 - Reports on the significance of R. (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor (SC) that the Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013 was unlawful under both domestic and EU law as it effectively prevented access to justice.

AB - Reports on the significance of R. (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor (SC) that the Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013 was unlawful under both domestic and EU law as it effectively prevented access to justice.

KW - access to justice

KW - employment tribunals

KW - fees

M3 - Article

VL - 2017

SP - 261

EP - 267

JO - Juridical Review

JF - Juridical Review

SN - 0022-6785

IS - 4

ER -