R (on the application of A and B) v Secretary of State for Health (United Kingdom): what is the cost of reproductive rights?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Abstract

R (on the application of A and B) v Secretary of State for Health (hereinafter A and B) was heard at the UK Supreme Court amid growing media attention paid to the prohibition on abortion in Northern Ireland (NI) and against the backdrop of the Campaign to Repeal the Eighth Amendment in Ireland.

The Abortion Act 1967 was not extended to NI, which meant that abortion provision has always existed in something of a legal vacuum there. Rather than the framework adopted in England, Scotland and Wales that allows doctors to provide abortions if certain criteria are met, abortions could only be legally carried out in NI when there was a threat to the woman’s physical or mental health or life. This meant that there was some provision of legal abortion in NI but the vast majority of people needing an abortion were forced to travel to Great Britain to seek abortion care. The lack of guidance on when an abortion was legal meant that there was a series of cases seeking judicial clarity on the matter.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationQueer Judgments Project
EditorsNuno Ferreira, Maria Federica Moscati, Senthorun Raj
Place of PublicationOxford
Chapter20
Number of pages22
ISBN (Electronic)9781910761229
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 25 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • reproductive rights
  • abortion
  • Northern Ireland
  • Supreme Court

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'R (on the application of A and B) v Secretary of State for Health (United Kingdom): what is the cost of reproductive rights?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this