Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? On being critical about critical pedagogy in physical education

David Kirk

doi:10.22456/1982-8918.96244

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? On being critical about critical pedagogy in physical education

David Kirk

Education

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

A challenge for critical pedagogy in physical education is how to take forward an agenda in circumstances of precarity while avoiding the many pitfalls, such as indoctrination, utopianism and self-conceit, that could diminish its effectiveness as well as its reputation. This paper considers the possibility of being critical about critical pedagogy while remaining passionate for the cause of social justice through education. To date, it has appeared to be sufficient for critical pedagogues in physical education to regulate themselves, but this has failed to produce any agreement on how critical pedagogy might respond, for example, to rising precarity. Five key points emerge from an analysis of Burbules’ work on critical pedagogy. I consider how we might build self-awareness and self-critique into critical pedagogy in physical education, and by so doing address both the challenges raised by critiques of critical pedagogy and indeed the question itself of quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Language	English
Article number	e25062
Number of pages	13
Journal	Movimento
Volume	25
DOIs	10.22456/1982-8918.96244
Publication status	Published - 15 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

physical education

self awareness

reputation

social justice

cause

education

Keywords

critical pedagogy
precarity
self-critique
physical education
PE
social justice

Cite this

Kirk, D. (2019). Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? On being critical about critical pedagogy in physical education. Movimento, 25, [e25062]. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.96244

Kirk, David. / Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? On being critical about critical pedagogy in physical education. In: Movimento. 2019 ; Vol. 25.

@article{6ffb15d3927a4035b6005dad6153a9f8,

title = "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? On being critical about critical pedagogy in physical education",

abstract = "A challenge for critical pedagogy in physical education is how to take forward an agenda in circumstances of precarity while avoiding the many pitfalls, such as indoctrination, utopianism and self-conceit, that could diminish its effectiveness as well as its reputation. This paper considers the possibility of being critical about critical pedagogy while remaining passionate for the cause of social justice through education. To date, it has appeared to be sufficient for critical pedagogues in physical education to regulate themselves, but this has failed to produce any agreement on how critical pedagogy might respond, for example, to rising precarity. Five key points emerge from an analysis of Burbules’ work on critical pedagogy. I consider how we might build self-awareness and self-critique into critical pedagogy in physical education, and by so doing address both the challenges raised by critiques of critical pedagogy and indeed the question itself of quis custodiet ipsos custodes?",

keywords = "critical pedagogy, precarity, self-critique, physical education, PE, social justice",

author = "David Kirk",

year = "2019",

month = "11",

day = "15",

doi = "10.22456/1982-8918.96244",

language = "English",

volume = "25",

journal = "Movimento",

issn = "0104-754X",

}

Kirk, D 2019, 'Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? On being critical about critical pedagogy in physical education' Movimento, vol. 25, e25062. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.96244

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? On being critical about critical pedagogy in physical education. / Kirk, David.

In: Movimento, Vol. 25, e25062, 15.11.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? On being critical about critical pedagogy in physical education

AU - Kirk, David

PY - 2019/11/15

Y1 - 2019/11/15

N2 - A challenge for critical pedagogy in physical education is how to take forward an agenda in circumstances of precarity while avoiding the many pitfalls, such as indoctrination, utopianism and self-conceit, that could diminish its effectiveness as well as its reputation. This paper considers the possibility of being critical about critical pedagogy while remaining passionate for the cause of social justice through education. To date, it has appeared to be sufficient for critical pedagogues in physical education to regulate themselves, but this has failed to produce any agreement on how critical pedagogy might respond, for example, to rising precarity. Five key points emerge from an analysis of Burbules’ work on critical pedagogy. I consider how we might build self-awareness and self-critique into critical pedagogy in physical education, and by so doing address both the challenges raised by critiques of critical pedagogy and indeed the question itself of quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

AB - A challenge for critical pedagogy in physical education is how to take forward an agenda in circumstances of precarity while avoiding the many pitfalls, such as indoctrination, utopianism and self-conceit, that could diminish its effectiveness as well as its reputation. This paper considers the possibility of being critical about critical pedagogy while remaining passionate for the cause of social justice through education. To date, it has appeared to be sufficient for critical pedagogues in physical education to regulate themselves, but this has failed to produce any agreement on how critical pedagogy might respond, for example, to rising precarity. Five key points emerge from an analysis of Burbules’ work on critical pedagogy. I consider how we might build self-awareness and self-critique into critical pedagogy in physical education, and by so doing address both the challenges raised by critiques of critical pedagogy and indeed the question itself of quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

KW - critical pedagogy

KW - precarity

KW - self-critique

KW - physical education

KW - PE

KW - social justice

UR - https://seer.ufrgs.br/Movimento

U2 - 10.22456/1982-8918.96244

DO - 10.22456/1982-8918.96244

M3 - Article

VL - 25

JO - Movimento