Questioning conventions

are product conventions trading off the usability of products for short term user satisfaction

Bryan Gough Young, Andrew Wodehouse, Marion Sheridan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

142 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Mapping conventions are a key aspect of user centered design as they present users with familiar interactions in unfamiliar products. Conventions evolve over time and are slow to be adopted, requiring a high percentage of acceptance within a society, ensuring that conventions exhibit a sufficient level of usability. However this paper argues that while usability is a necessary condition for good interactions it is not a sufficient one. Therefore user centered design which accents individuals bias towards conventions my in fact be hindering the innovation of product interactions. This paper argues that a cognitive approach should be adopted in order understand and reassess product interactions. An experiment was carried out that demonstrates the influence that simple mappings can have on cognitive load. The results showed that basic mappings of the types that are found throughout product conventions can have a substantial impact on mental load and subsequently product interaction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-58
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education
Volume3
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Sodium Glutamate
interaction
Innovation
acceptance
innovation
Experiments
experiment
trend
User centered design

Keywords

  • cognitive engineering
  • cognitive load theory
  • user centered design
  • product Interaction
  • product conventions

Cite this

@article{e62f976e4e8f47048d848d262a1dbcb1,
title = "Questioning conventions: are product conventions trading off the usability of products for short term user satisfaction",
abstract = "Mapping conventions are a key aspect of user centered design as they present users with familiar interactions in unfamiliar products. Conventions evolve over time and are slow to be adopted, requiring a high percentage of acceptance within a society, ensuring that conventions exhibit a sufficient level of usability. However this paper argues that while usability is a necessary condition for good interactions it is not a sufficient one. Therefore user centered design which accents individuals bias towards conventions my in fact be hindering the innovation of product interactions. This paper argues that a cognitive approach should be adopted in order understand and reassess product interactions. An experiment was carried out that demonstrates the influence that simple mappings can have on cognitive load. The results showed that basic mappings of the types that are found throughout product conventions can have a substantial impact on mental load and subsequently product interaction.",
keywords = "cognitive engineering, cognitive load theory, user centered design, product Interaction, product conventions",
author = "Young, {Bryan Gough} and Andrew Wodehouse and Marion Sheridan",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "31",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "47--58",
journal = "International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education",
issn = "2334-847X",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Questioning conventions

T2 - are product conventions trading off the usability of products for short term user satisfaction

AU - Young, Bryan Gough

AU - Wodehouse, Andrew

AU - Sheridan, Marion

PY - 2015/12/31

Y1 - 2015/12/31

N2 - Mapping conventions are a key aspect of user centered design as they present users with familiar interactions in unfamiliar products. Conventions evolve over time and are slow to be adopted, requiring a high percentage of acceptance within a society, ensuring that conventions exhibit a sufficient level of usability. However this paper argues that while usability is a necessary condition for good interactions it is not a sufficient one. Therefore user centered design which accents individuals bias towards conventions my in fact be hindering the innovation of product interactions. This paper argues that a cognitive approach should be adopted in order understand and reassess product interactions. An experiment was carried out that demonstrates the influence that simple mappings can have on cognitive load. The results showed that basic mappings of the types that are found throughout product conventions can have a substantial impact on mental load and subsequently product interaction.

AB - Mapping conventions are a key aspect of user centered design as they present users with familiar interactions in unfamiliar products. Conventions evolve over time and are slow to be adopted, requiring a high percentage of acceptance within a society, ensuring that conventions exhibit a sufficient level of usability. However this paper argues that while usability is a necessary condition for good interactions it is not a sufficient one. Therefore user centered design which accents individuals bias towards conventions my in fact be hindering the innovation of product interactions. This paper argues that a cognitive approach should be adopted in order understand and reassess product interactions. An experiment was carried out that demonstrates the influence that simple mappings can have on cognitive load. The results showed that basic mappings of the types that are found throughout product conventions can have a substantial impact on mental load and subsequently product interaction.

KW - cognitive engineering

KW - cognitive load theory

KW - user centered design

KW - product Interaction

KW - product conventions

UR - http://www.ijcrsee.com/index.php/ijcrsee/article/view/178

UR - http://www.ijcrsee.com/index.php/ijcrsee

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 47

EP - 58

JO - International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education

JF - International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education

SN - 2334-847X

IS - 2

ER -