Questioning children

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper considers one key aspect of doing Philosophy with Children: the use of children's questions. In particular, the paper reflects upon the place and importance of children's questions in McCall's Community of Philosophical Inquiry (CoPI). Generally children are allowed, within Philosophy with Children practices to ask their own questions. In some approaches questions are set for the children to inquire into. These questions often come from teachers' manuals. What is different about McCall's CoPI is that the facilitator selects the questions for the inquiry and not the children. McCall's CoPI is practised by facilitators with a background in philosophy, who are therefore able to recognise the philosophical potential in children's own questions and who are also able to structure dialogue to stimulate and engender philosophical dialogue. In the article it is further suggested that not using children's questions to promote philosophical dialogue, poses some fundamental questions about how children are perceived and how this may impact upon their place and potential voices in society.
LanguageEnglish
Pages62-68
Number of pages7
JournalThinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children
Volume20
Issue number1 & 2
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Questioning
Philosophical Inquiry
Philosophy
Philosophical Dialogue
Fundamental

Keywords

  • children
  • children's philosophy
  • philosophy
  • philosophy with children
  • philosophical inquiry

Cite this

@article{1bb8f22e06874535912be3af8eb00d34,
title = "Questioning children",
abstract = "This paper considers one key aspect of doing Philosophy with Children: the use of children's questions. In particular, the paper reflects upon the place and importance of children's questions in McCall's Community of Philosophical Inquiry (CoPI). Generally children are allowed, within Philosophy with Children practices to ask their own questions. In some approaches questions are set for the children to inquire into. These questions often come from teachers' manuals. What is different about McCall's CoPI is that the facilitator selects the questions for the inquiry and not the children. McCall's CoPI is practised by facilitators with a background in philosophy, who are therefore able to recognise the philosophical potential in children's own questions and who are also able to structure dialogue to stimulate and engender philosophical dialogue. In the article it is further suggested that not using children's questions to promote philosophical dialogue, poses some fundamental questions about how children are perceived and how this may impact upon their place and potential voices in society.",
keywords = "children, children's philosophy, philosophy, philosophy with children, philosophical inquiry",
author = "Claire Cassidy",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "62--68",
journal = "Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children",
issn = "0190-3330",
number = "1 & 2",

}

Questioning children. / Cassidy, Claire.

In: Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, Vol. 20, No. 1 & 2, 2012, p. 62-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Questioning children

AU - Cassidy, Claire

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This paper considers one key aspect of doing Philosophy with Children: the use of children's questions. In particular, the paper reflects upon the place and importance of children's questions in McCall's Community of Philosophical Inquiry (CoPI). Generally children are allowed, within Philosophy with Children practices to ask their own questions. In some approaches questions are set for the children to inquire into. These questions often come from teachers' manuals. What is different about McCall's CoPI is that the facilitator selects the questions for the inquiry and not the children. McCall's CoPI is practised by facilitators with a background in philosophy, who are therefore able to recognise the philosophical potential in children's own questions and who are also able to structure dialogue to stimulate and engender philosophical dialogue. In the article it is further suggested that not using children's questions to promote philosophical dialogue, poses some fundamental questions about how children are perceived and how this may impact upon their place and potential voices in society.

AB - This paper considers one key aspect of doing Philosophy with Children: the use of children's questions. In particular, the paper reflects upon the place and importance of children's questions in McCall's Community of Philosophical Inquiry (CoPI). Generally children are allowed, within Philosophy with Children practices to ask their own questions. In some approaches questions are set for the children to inquire into. These questions often come from teachers' manuals. What is different about McCall's CoPI is that the facilitator selects the questions for the inquiry and not the children. McCall's CoPI is practised by facilitators with a background in philosophy, who are therefore able to recognise the philosophical potential in children's own questions and who are also able to structure dialogue to stimulate and engender philosophical dialogue. In the article it is further suggested that not using children's questions to promote philosophical dialogue, poses some fundamental questions about how children are perceived and how this may impact upon their place and potential voices in society.

KW - children

KW - children's philosophy

KW - philosophy

KW - philosophy with children

KW - philosophical inquiry

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 62

EP - 68

JO - Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children

T2 - Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children

JF - Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children

SN - 0190-3330

IS - 1 & 2

ER -