Queer disability, postcolonial feminism and the monsters of evolution

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article offers an original analysis of contemporary representations of evolutionary theory. It does so by turning to the lesser-known work of evolutionary biologist Richard Goldschmidt, who placed the “hopeful monster” at the heart of evolution. Diverging from the critiques of evolutionary theory as a colonial, able-ist, racist and misogynist discourse, this article proposes Goldschmidt’s The Material Basis of Evolution as the potential to reconfigure feminist, postcolonial, crip and queer approaches to narratives of origins. Focusing on the ever-rising presence of macromutation in contemporary literary and visual texts, this article offers an important contribution to feminist, postcolonial, crip and queer thinking on inter-and intra-relationality between species and environments, on difference, and on the temporality of species development. It situates its analysis of Hiromi Goto’s Hopeful Monsters in contemporary Canadian politics of colonisation, multiculturalism and the increased medicalisation of racialised and disabled bodies. In so doing, if offers a considerable contribution to the analysis of the necropolitical landscape of postcolonial belonging, addressing how little known theories of evolution may challenge such structural inequalities and violence.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationA Feminist Companion to the Posthumanities
EditorsCecilia Asberg, Rosi Braidotti
Place of PublicationBerlin
PublisherSpringer
Chapter13
Pages153–164
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9783319621401
ISBN (Print)9783319621388, 9783030096724
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 May 2018

Keywords

  • hopeful monsters
  • Hiromi Goto
  • Richard Goldschmidt
  • postcolonial theory
  • queer theory
  • evolutionary theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Queer disability, postcolonial feminism and the monsters of evolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this