Abstract
Despite its growing popularity, there is limited evidence of the effectiveness of ultrasound visual biofeedback speech therapy for children with cleft palate ± cleft lip (CP ± L). This study reports on the findings of a pilot feasibility study of ultrasound visual biofeedback versus standard care. Results will be used to determine if a full-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT) is feasible.
Methods:
We used a mixed-methods pilot RCT. Participants were children aged 5–16 with repaired CP ± L and at least one compensatory articulation. Participants were randomised, stratified for age, to receive six sessions of either articulation therapy (standard care) or ultrasound visual biofeedback (U-VBF) therapy. Outcome indicators for progression to full trial were measured as percentage targets achieved including the following: participants recruited and retained; outcome measure completion; and therapy protocol adherence. Due to the nature of treatment, the treating Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs) and families were not blinded; however, the assessing SLTs were blinded to treatment allocation until the end of the trial.
Results:
Eight participants were randomised to articulation therapy and eleven to ultrasound. All participants’ data was included for analysis. All but one of the pre-determined criteria for moving to full trial were fully met and the remaining indicator was partially met. At least 75% of the following were achieved: outcome measure completion; therapy protocol adherence; participant retention in each arm of the study. The target number of participants, 20 per treatment arm, was not reached.
Conclusion:
Most feasibility measures were successful. This study suggests that a full RCT comparing articulation therapy to U-VBF therapy would be possible if the current recruitment strategy is addressed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 61 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Pilot and Feasibility Studies |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 6 May 2025 |
Funding
Source of monetary or material support is Chief Scientist Office of Scotland. Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate, TCS/20/02, Joanne Cleland
Keywords
- cleft palate +/- cleft lip
- articulation intervention
- ultrasound visual biofeedback
- speech therapy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative results of SonoSpeech Cleft Pilot: a mixed-methods pilot randomised control trial of ultrasound visual biofeedback versus standard intervention for children with cleft palate ± cleft lip'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
SonoSpeech Cleft Pilot: A pilot randomised control trial of ultrasound visual biofeedback versus standard intervention for children with cleft lip and palate
Cleland, J. (Principal Investigator)
1/08/21 → 31/01/24
Project: Research
Datasets
-
SonoSpeech Data Collection Instruments
Cleland, J. (Creator) & Dokovova, M. (Contributor), University of Strathclyde, 16 Sept 2021
DOI: 10.15129/f65343c4-7781-44fe-9b00-516d4597efac
Dataset
-
Data for "Quantitative results of SonoSpeech Cleft Pilot: a mixed-methods pilot randomised control trial of ultrasound visual biofeedback versus standard intervention for children with cleft palate ± cleft lip"
Cairney, M. (Creator), Crampin, L. (Contributor), Campbell, L. (Contributor) & Cleland, J. (Creator), Open Science Framework (OSF), 31 Aug 2025
Dataset
-
Current approaches for the management of speech disorders
Cleland, J., 12 Jul 2025.Research output: Contribution to conference › Keynote › peer-review
-
Sonospeech Cleft Pilot: results from a pilot randomised control trial of ultrasound visual biofeedback versus standard intervention for children with cleft palate +/- cleft lip (CP+/-L)
Cleland, J., Cairney, M., McCluskey , R., Crampin, L. & Campbell, L., 2025.Research output: Contribution to conference › Presentation/Speech › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver