Quantitative and qualitative analysis of an individualized consultation to change sedentary behavior in the workplace

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstract

Abstract

Independent of an individual’s physical activity levels, prolonged periods of sedentary behavior are detrimental to health. Office-based workers engage in prolonged periods of sitting and are a target group for intervention. Individualized consultations have potential to change sedentary behavior and offer a low cost alternative to interventions such as sit-to-stand desks. PURPOSE: To report quantitative and qualitative outcomes from a randomized controlled trial exploring the use of an individualized consultation intervention to change sedentary behavior in the workplace. METHODS: 48 participants (42F, 6M, mean age 42.9±12.0 yrs, BMI 25.2±3.8 kg/m2) were recruited from a university by workplace email and poster distribution. Participants were > 18yrs with full time desk based occupations. Participants were randomized to a control group (n=23) or an intervention (n=25) group who received a 30-45 minute individual consultation incorporating behavior change strategies to support reducing sedentary behavior. Before and after the intervention participants wore an activPAL monitor for 7 days. A sub-sample of 16 intervention participants took part in semi-structured interviews exploring intervention perceptions. RESULTS: No changes were reported in overall, weekday or weekend mean sitting, standing or stepping time; step count; sit-to-stand transitions or % of waking day spent sitting, standing or stepping (p>0.05). Semi-structured interviews provided insight into participant intervention perceptions. Many participants mentioned increased knowledge and awareness of sedentary behavior and the associated physical and psychological benefits. However, several barriers to behavior change were reported including: social norms within a workplace; perceived negative opinion of colleagues; excessive workloads and deadlines and loss of concentration and productivity. CONCLUSIONS: The individualized consultation intervention was not effective in changing sedentary behavior. Multi-level barriers impede sedentary behavior change in the workplace. Further work is required to fully understand these complex influences on this behavior in a workplace setting to allow the development and implementation of effective interventions.

Conference

ConferenceAmerican College of Sports Medicine 64th Annual Meeting
Abbreviated titleACSM 2017
CountryUnited States
CityDenver
Period30/05/173/06/17
Internet address

Fingerprint

Workplace
Referral and Consultation
Interviews
Posters
Workload
Occupations
Randomized Controlled Trials
Psychology
Costs and Cost Analysis
Control Groups
Health

Keywords

  • physical activity levels
  • sedentary behavior
  • workplace activity

Cite this

Kirk, A., Gibson, A-M., Hughes, A., & Muggeridge, D. (2017). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of an individualized consultation to change sedentary behavior in the workplace. Abstract from American College of Sports Medicine 64th Annual Meeting, Denver, United States.
Kirk, Alison ; Gibson, Ann-Marie ; Hughes, Adrienne ; Muggeridge, David. / Quantitative and qualitative analysis of an individualized consultation to change sedentary behavior in the workplace. Abstract from American College of Sports Medicine 64th Annual Meeting, Denver, United States.
@conference{4030737b5dbb43508132a1cec0299d49,
title = "Quantitative and qualitative analysis of an individualized consultation to change sedentary behavior in the workplace",
abstract = "Independent of an individual’s physical activity levels, prolonged periods of sedentary behavior are detrimental to health. Office-based workers engage in prolonged periods of sitting and are a target group for intervention. Individualized consultations have potential to change sedentary behavior and offer a low cost alternative to interventions such as sit-to-stand desks. PURPOSE: To report quantitative and qualitative outcomes from a randomized controlled trial exploring the use of an individualized consultation intervention to change sedentary behavior in the workplace. METHODS: 48 participants (42F, 6M, mean age 42.9±12.0 yrs, BMI 25.2±3.8 kg/m2) were recruited from a university by workplace email and poster distribution. Participants were > 18yrs with full time desk based occupations. Participants were randomized to a control group (n=23) or an intervention (n=25) group who received a 30-45 minute individual consultation incorporating behavior change strategies to support reducing sedentary behavior. Before and after the intervention participants wore an activPAL monitor for 7 days. A sub-sample of 16 intervention participants took part in semi-structured interviews exploring intervention perceptions. RESULTS: No changes were reported in overall, weekday or weekend mean sitting, standing or stepping time; step count; sit-to-stand transitions or {\%} of waking day spent sitting, standing or stepping (p>0.05). Semi-structured interviews provided insight into participant intervention perceptions. Many participants mentioned increased knowledge and awareness of sedentary behavior and the associated physical and psychological benefits. However, several barriers to behavior change were reported including: social norms within a workplace; perceived negative opinion of colleagues; excessive workloads and deadlines and loss of concentration and productivity. CONCLUSIONS: The individualized consultation intervention was not effective in changing sedentary behavior. Multi-level barriers impede sedentary behavior change in the workplace. Further work is required to fully understand these complex influences on this behavior in a workplace setting to allow the development and implementation of effective interventions.",
keywords = "physical activity levels, sedentary behavior, workplace activity",
author = "Alison Kirk and Ann-Marie Gibson and Adrienne Hughes and David Muggeridge",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "30",
language = "English",
note = "American College of Sports Medicine 64th Annual Meeting : 8th World Congress on Exercise is Medicine{\circledR} and World Congress on the Basic Science of Exercise and the Brain, ACSM 2017 ; Conference date: 30-05-2017 Through 03-06-2017",
url = "http://www.acsmannualmeeting.org",

}

Kirk, A, Gibson, A-M, Hughes, A & Muggeridge, D 2017, 'Quantitative and qualitative analysis of an individualized consultation to change sedentary behavior in the workplace' American College of Sports Medicine 64th Annual Meeting, Denver, United States, 30/05/17 - 3/06/17, .

Quantitative and qualitative analysis of an individualized consultation to change sedentary behavior in the workplace. / Kirk, Alison; Gibson, Ann-Marie; Hughes, Adrienne; Muggeridge, David.

2017. Abstract from American College of Sports Medicine 64th Annual Meeting, Denver, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstract

TY - CONF

T1 - Quantitative and qualitative analysis of an individualized consultation to change sedentary behavior in the workplace

AU - Kirk, Alison

AU - Gibson, Ann-Marie

AU - Hughes, Adrienne

AU - Muggeridge, David

PY - 2017/5/30

Y1 - 2017/5/30

N2 - Independent of an individual’s physical activity levels, prolonged periods of sedentary behavior are detrimental to health. Office-based workers engage in prolonged periods of sitting and are a target group for intervention. Individualized consultations have potential to change sedentary behavior and offer a low cost alternative to interventions such as sit-to-stand desks. PURPOSE: To report quantitative and qualitative outcomes from a randomized controlled trial exploring the use of an individualized consultation intervention to change sedentary behavior in the workplace. METHODS: 48 participants (42F, 6M, mean age 42.9±12.0 yrs, BMI 25.2±3.8 kg/m2) were recruited from a university by workplace email and poster distribution. Participants were > 18yrs with full time desk based occupations. Participants were randomized to a control group (n=23) or an intervention (n=25) group who received a 30-45 minute individual consultation incorporating behavior change strategies to support reducing sedentary behavior. Before and after the intervention participants wore an activPAL monitor for 7 days. A sub-sample of 16 intervention participants took part in semi-structured interviews exploring intervention perceptions. RESULTS: No changes were reported in overall, weekday or weekend mean sitting, standing or stepping time; step count; sit-to-stand transitions or % of waking day spent sitting, standing or stepping (p>0.05). Semi-structured interviews provided insight into participant intervention perceptions. Many participants mentioned increased knowledge and awareness of sedentary behavior and the associated physical and psychological benefits. However, several barriers to behavior change were reported including: social norms within a workplace; perceived negative opinion of colleagues; excessive workloads and deadlines and loss of concentration and productivity. CONCLUSIONS: The individualized consultation intervention was not effective in changing sedentary behavior. Multi-level barriers impede sedentary behavior change in the workplace. Further work is required to fully understand these complex influences on this behavior in a workplace setting to allow the development and implementation of effective interventions.

AB - Independent of an individual’s physical activity levels, prolonged periods of sedentary behavior are detrimental to health. Office-based workers engage in prolonged periods of sitting and are a target group for intervention. Individualized consultations have potential to change sedentary behavior and offer a low cost alternative to interventions such as sit-to-stand desks. PURPOSE: To report quantitative and qualitative outcomes from a randomized controlled trial exploring the use of an individualized consultation intervention to change sedentary behavior in the workplace. METHODS: 48 participants (42F, 6M, mean age 42.9±12.0 yrs, BMI 25.2±3.8 kg/m2) were recruited from a university by workplace email and poster distribution. Participants were > 18yrs with full time desk based occupations. Participants were randomized to a control group (n=23) or an intervention (n=25) group who received a 30-45 minute individual consultation incorporating behavior change strategies to support reducing sedentary behavior. Before and after the intervention participants wore an activPAL monitor for 7 days. A sub-sample of 16 intervention participants took part in semi-structured interviews exploring intervention perceptions. RESULTS: No changes were reported in overall, weekday or weekend mean sitting, standing or stepping time; step count; sit-to-stand transitions or % of waking day spent sitting, standing or stepping (p>0.05). Semi-structured interviews provided insight into participant intervention perceptions. Many participants mentioned increased knowledge and awareness of sedentary behavior and the associated physical and psychological benefits. However, several barriers to behavior change were reported including: social norms within a workplace; perceived negative opinion of colleagues; excessive workloads and deadlines and loss of concentration and productivity. CONCLUSIONS: The individualized consultation intervention was not effective in changing sedentary behavior. Multi-level barriers impede sedentary behavior change in the workplace. Further work is required to fully understand these complex influences on this behavior in a workplace setting to allow the development and implementation of effective interventions.

KW - physical activity levels

KW - sedentary behavior

KW - workplace activity

UR - http://www.acsmannualmeeting.org/

M3 - Abstract

ER -

Kirk A, Gibson A-M, Hughes A, Muggeridge D. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of an individualized consultation to change sedentary behavior in the workplace. 2017. Abstract from American College of Sports Medicine 64th Annual Meeting, Denver, United States.