Quantifying the benefit of SHM: can the VoI be negative?

Andrea Verzobio, Denise Bolognani, Daniele Zonta, John Quigley

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution book

Abstract

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is generally presented as a powerful tool that allows bridge managers to make decisions on maintenance, reconstruction and repair of their assets. The benefit of SHM can be properly quantified using the concept of Value of Information (VoI), i.e. the difference between the utilities of operating the structure with and without the monitoring system. In calculating the VoI, two understood assumptions are that all decisions concerning system installation and operation are taken by the same rational agent and that "information never hurts", i.e. VoI is guaranteed to be non-negative. However, in the real world, the individual who decides on buying a monitoring system, the owner, is often not the same individual, the manager, who will use it once the system has been installed, and they may be-have differently because of their different risk aversion. We develop a formulation to properly evaluate the VoI from the owner perspective, when the manager is a different individual. We demonstrate that in a decision-making process where the two individuals involved share exactly the same information, but behave differently, the VoI can be negative and that we can always find a combination of prior probabilities and utility functions which ultimately yields a negative conditional VoI. Indeed, even if the two agents have an agreement a priori, due to their different behaviors, their optimal actions can diverge after the installation of the monitoring system. We apply this formulation on a real-life case study concerning the Streicker Bridge (NJ, USA).

LanguageEnglish
Title of host publication13th Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2019
EditorsJerome P. Lynch, Hoon Sohn, Kon-Well Wang, Haiying Huang
Place of PublicationBellingham, WA, USA
Number of pages8
Volume10970
ISBN (Electronic)9781510625952
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Mar 2019
EventSensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2019 - Denver, United States
Duration: 4 Mar 20197 Mar 2019

Conference

ConferenceSensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2019
CountryUnited States
CityDenver
Period4/03/197/03/19

Fingerprint

Value of Information
structural health monitoring
Structural health monitoring
Health Monitoring
Managers
Monitoring
Monitoring System
Reconstruction (structural)
Repair
Decision making
installing
Decision System
Prior Probability
Risk Aversion
Formulation
Probability function
Diverge
Utility Function
formulations
decision making

Keywords

  • decision making
  • Structural Health Monitoring
  • Value of Information
  • SHM
  • monitoring systems

Cite this

Verzobio, A., Bolognani, D., Zonta, D., & Quigley, J. (2019). Quantifying the benefit of SHM: can the VoI be negative? In J. P. Lynch, H. Sohn, K-W. Wang, & H. Huang (Eds.), 13th Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2019 (Vol. 10970). [109701I] Bellingham, WA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2518878
Verzobio, Andrea ; Bolognani, Denise ; Zonta, Daniele ; Quigley, John. / Quantifying the benefit of SHM : can the VoI be negative?. 13th Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2019. editor / Jerome P. Lynch ; Hoon Sohn ; Kon-Well Wang ; Haiying Huang. Vol. 10970 Bellingham, WA, USA, 2019.
@inproceedings{a3d700091bc84de88ec0dbd704cbf7db,
title = "Quantifying the benefit of SHM: can the VoI be negative?",
abstract = "Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is generally presented as a powerful tool that allows bridge managers to make decisions on maintenance, reconstruction and repair of their assets. The benefit of SHM can be properly quantified using the concept of Value of Information (VoI), i.e. the difference between the utilities of operating the structure with and without the monitoring system. In calculating the VoI, two understood assumptions are that all decisions concerning system installation and operation are taken by the same rational agent and that {"}information never hurts{"}, i.e. VoI is guaranteed to be non-negative. However, in the real world, the individual who decides on buying a monitoring system, the owner, is often not the same individual, the manager, who will use it once the system has been installed, and they may be-have differently because of their different risk aversion. We develop a formulation to properly evaluate the VoI from the owner perspective, when the manager is a different individual. We demonstrate that in a decision-making process where the two individuals involved share exactly the same information, but behave differently, the VoI can be negative and that we can always find a combination of prior probabilities and utility functions which ultimately yields a negative conditional VoI. Indeed, even if the two agents have an agreement a priori, due to their different behaviors, their optimal actions can diverge after the installation of the monitoring system. We apply this formulation on a real-life case study concerning the Streicker Bridge (NJ, USA).",
keywords = "decision making, Structural Health Monitoring, Value of Information, SHM, monitoring systems",
author = "Andrea Verzobio and Denise Bolognani and Daniele Zonta and John Quigley",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1117/12.2518878",
language = "English",
volume = "10970",
editor = "Lynch, {Jerome P.} and Hoon Sohn and Kon-Well Wang and Haiying Huang",
booktitle = "13th Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2019",

}

Verzobio, A, Bolognani, D, Zonta, D & Quigley, J 2019, Quantifying the benefit of SHM: can the VoI be negative? in JP Lynch, H Sohn, K-W Wang & H Huang (eds), 13th Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2019. vol. 10970, 109701I, Bellingham, WA, USA, Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2019, Denver, United States, 4/03/19. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2518878

Quantifying the benefit of SHM : can the VoI be negative? / Verzobio, Andrea; Bolognani, Denise; Zonta, Daniele; Quigley, John.

13th Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2019. ed. / Jerome P. Lynch; Hoon Sohn; Kon-Well Wang; Haiying Huang. Vol. 10970 Bellingham, WA, USA, 2019. 109701I.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution book

TY - GEN

T1 - Quantifying the benefit of SHM

T2 - can the VoI be negative?

AU - Verzobio, Andrea

AU - Bolognani, Denise

AU - Zonta, Daniele

AU - Quigley, John

PY - 2019/3/27

Y1 - 2019/3/27

N2 - Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is generally presented as a powerful tool that allows bridge managers to make decisions on maintenance, reconstruction and repair of their assets. The benefit of SHM can be properly quantified using the concept of Value of Information (VoI), i.e. the difference between the utilities of operating the structure with and without the monitoring system. In calculating the VoI, two understood assumptions are that all decisions concerning system installation and operation are taken by the same rational agent and that "information never hurts", i.e. VoI is guaranteed to be non-negative. However, in the real world, the individual who decides on buying a monitoring system, the owner, is often not the same individual, the manager, who will use it once the system has been installed, and they may be-have differently because of their different risk aversion. We develop a formulation to properly evaluate the VoI from the owner perspective, when the manager is a different individual. We demonstrate that in a decision-making process where the two individuals involved share exactly the same information, but behave differently, the VoI can be negative and that we can always find a combination of prior probabilities and utility functions which ultimately yields a negative conditional VoI. Indeed, even if the two agents have an agreement a priori, due to their different behaviors, their optimal actions can diverge after the installation of the monitoring system. We apply this formulation on a real-life case study concerning the Streicker Bridge (NJ, USA).

AB - Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is generally presented as a powerful tool that allows bridge managers to make decisions on maintenance, reconstruction and repair of their assets. The benefit of SHM can be properly quantified using the concept of Value of Information (VoI), i.e. the difference between the utilities of operating the structure with and without the monitoring system. In calculating the VoI, two understood assumptions are that all decisions concerning system installation and operation are taken by the same rational agent and that "information never hurts", i.e. VoI is guaranteed to be non-negative. However, in the real world, the individual who decides on buying a monitoring system, the owner, is often not the same individual, the manager, who will use it once the system has been installed, and they may be-have differently because of their different risk aversion. We develop a formulation to properly evaluate the VoI from the owner perspective, when the manager is a different individual. We demonstrate that in a decision-making process where the two individuals involved share exactly the same information, but behave differently, the VoI can be negative and that we can always find a combination of prior probabilities and utility functions which ultimately yields a negative conditional VoI. Indeed, even if the two agents have an agreement a priori, due to their different behaviors, their optimal actions can diverge after the installation of the monitoring system. We apply this formulation on a real-life case study concerning the Streicker Bridge (NJ, USA).

KW - decision making

KW - Structural Health Monitoring

KW - Value of Information

KW - SHM

KW - monitoring systems

U2 - 10.1117/12.2518878

DO - 10.1117/12.2518878

M3 - Conference contribution book

VL - 10970

BT - 13th Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2019

A2 - Lynch, Jerome P.

A2 - Sohn, Hoon

A2 - Wang, Kon-Well

A2 - Huang, Haiying

CY - Bellingham, WA, USA

ER -

Verzobio A, Bolognani D, Zonta D, Quigley J. Quantifying the benefit of SHM: can the VoI be negative? In Lynch JP, Sohn H, Wang K-W, Huang H, editors, 13th Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2019. Vol. 10970. Bellingham, WA, USA. 2019. 109701I https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2518878