Qualitative import risk assessment: a proposed method for estimating the aggregated probability of entry of infection

L. Kelly, R. Kosmider, P. Gale, E. L. Snary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In the absence of sufficient numerical data, qualitative risk assessment is recognised as an important tool for providing risk managers with evidence-based predictions on which to formulate their decisions. Such approaches have been used in the area of animal health for import risk assessment for both livestock and zoonotic pathogens. Very few qualitative import risk assessments have, however, considered the aggregated probability of introduction, that is, the probability of at least one infected/contaminated entry per group of import units. Those that have are generally based on specific cases and do not follow a generic approach. In this paper, we consider whether or not it is feasible to develop a generic method and under what circumstances such an approach could be applied in practice. Our conclusion is that it would be difficult to specify a generic method because any such approach would rely on specifying numerical bounds for qualitative categories of probability as well as an idea of the number of imports and would thus be case-specific. As an alternative we propose a way of using case by case information to create a simple graphical reference tool which removes some of the subjectivity that is often associated with deriving qualitative risk. The reference tool considers various qualitative categories of individual probability and determines the relationship between this probability, the number of imports and the aggregated probability of entry. Applying the reference tool to a previously published case-study demonstrated some differences in conclusions and suggests that more subjective approaches can under-estimate probability and thus risk. It is concluded that this approach may be useful for future qualitative assessments of aggregated probability, provided that bounds for qualitative probabilities can be defined for the specific case situation.
LanguageEnglish
Pages33-37
Number of pages5
JournalMicrobial Risk Analysis
Volume9
Early online date8 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Risk Assessment
Infection
Group of Units
Zoonoses
Livestock
Animals
Health
Sufficient
Prediction
Alternatives
Estimate

Keywords

  • aggregated probability
  • qualitative import risk assessment
  • qualitative categories
  • qualitative bounds
  • risk matrices

Cite this

@article{03c5c9b381924f749d70d4ac315cffe6,
title = "Qualitative import risk assessment: a proposed method for estimating the aggregated probability of entry of infection",
abstract = "In the absence of sufficient numerical data, qualitative risk assessment is recognised as an important tool for providing risk managers with evidence-based predictions on which to formulate their decisions. Such approaches have been used in the area of animal health for import risk assessment for both livestock and zoonotic pathogens. Very few qualitative import risk assessments have, however, considered the aggregated probability of introduction, that is, the probability of at least one infected/contaminated entry per group of import units. Those that have are generally based on specific cases and do not follow a generic approach. In this paper, we consider whether or not it is feasible to develop a generic method and under what circumstances such an approach could be applied in practice. Our conclusion is that it would be difficult to specify a generic method because any such approach would rely on specifying numerical bounds for qualitative categories of probability as well as an idea of the number of imports and would thus be case-specific. As an alternative we propose a way of using case by case information to create a simple graphical reference tool which removes some of the subjectivity that is often associated with deriving qualitative risk. The reference tool considers various qualitative categories of individual probability and determines the relationship between this probability, the number of imports and the aggregated probability of entry. Applying the reference tool to a previously published case-study demonstrated some differences in conclusions and suggests that more subjective approaches can under-estimate probability and thus risk. It is concluded that this approach may be useful for future qualitative assessments of aggregated probability, provided that bounds for qualitative probabilities can be defined for the specific case situation.",
keywords = "aggregated probability, qualitative import risk assessment, qualitative categories, qualitative bounds, risk matrices",
author = "L. Kelly and R. Kosmider and P. Gale and Snary, {E. L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.mran.2018.03.001",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "33--37",
journal = "Microbial Risk Analysis",
issn = "2352-3522",

}

Qualitative import risk assessment : a proposed method for estimating the aggregated probability of entry of infection. / Kelly, L.; Kosmider, R.; Gale, P.; Snary, E. L.

In: Microbial Risk Analysis, Vol. 9, 31.08.2018, p. 33-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Qualitative import risk assessment

T2 - Microbial Risk Analysis

AU - Kelly, L.

AU - Kosmider, R.

AU - Gale, P.

AU - Snary, E. L.

PY - 2018/8/31

Y1 - 2018/8/31

N2 - In the absence of sufficient numerical data, qualitative risk assessment is recognised as an important tool for providing risk managers with evidence-based predictions on which to formulate their decisions. Such approaches have been used in the area of animal health for import risk assessment for both livestock and zoonotic pathogens. Very few qualitative import risk assessments have, however, considered the aggregated probability of introduction, that is, the probability of at least one infected/contaminated entry per group of import units. Those that have are generally based on specific cases and do not follow a generic approach. In this paper, we consider whether or not it is feasible to develop a generic method and under what circumstances such an approach could be applied in practice. Our conclusion is that it would be difficult to specify a generic method because any such approach would rely on specifying numerical bounds for qualitative categories of probability as well as an idea of the number of imports and would thus be case-specific. As an alternative we propose a way of using case by case information to create a simple graphical reference tool which removes some of the subjectivity that is often associated with deriving qualitative risk. The reference tool considers various qualitative categories of individual probability and determines the relationship between this probability, the number of imports and the aggregated probability of entry. Applying the reference tool to a previously published case-study demonstrated some differences in conclusions and suggests that more subjective approaches can under-estimate probability and thus risk. It is concluded that this approach may be useful for future qualitative assessments of aggregated probability, provided that bounds for qualitative probabilities can be defined for the specific case situation.

AB - In the absence of sufficient numerical data, qualitative risk assessment is recognised as an important tool for providing risk managers with evidence-based predictions on which to formulate their decisions. Such approaches have been used in the area of animal health for import risk assessment for both livestock and zoonotic pathogens. Very few qualitative import risk assessments have, however, considered the aggregated probability of introduction, that is, the probability of at least one infected/contaminated entry per group of import units. Those that have are generally based on specific cases and do not follow a generic approach. In this paper, we consider whether or not it is feasible to develop a generic method and under what circumstances such an approach could be applied in practice. Our conclusion is that it would be difficult to specify a generic method because any such approach would rely on specifying numerical bounds for qualitative categories of probability as well as an idea of the number of imports and would thus be case-specific. As an alternative we propose a way of using case by case information to create a simple graphical reference tool which removes some of the subjectivity that is often associated with deriving qualitative risk. The reference tool considers various qualitative categories of individual probability and determines the relationship between this probability, the number of imports and the aggregated probability of entry. Applying the reference tool to a previously published case-study demonstrated some differences in conclusions and suggests that more subjective approaches can under-estimate probability and thus risk. It is concluded that this approach may be useful for future qualitative assessments of aggregated probability, provided that bounds for qualitative probabilities can be defined for the specific case situation.

KW - aggregated probability

KW - qualitative import risk assessment

KW - qualitative categories

KW - qualitative bounds

KW - risk matrices

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352352217301020

U2 - 10.1016/j.mran.2018.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.mran.2018.03.001

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 33

EP - 37

JO - Microbial Risk Analysis

JF - Microbial Risk Analysis

SN - 2352-3522

ER -