Abstract
Regulating environmental outcomes without stipulating the technologies to accomplish them is a characteristically Ameri- can form of governmental intervention. This approach aims to encourage industry to address public-policy concerns while minimizing interference in its affairs. However, California’s zero-emission-vehicle mandate of 1990 implied the develop- ment of specific technologies with highly disruptive sociotechni- cal effects. The most practical zero-emission vehicle of the day was the all-battery electric vehicle, a technology characterized by the temporal mismatch of its components. Batteries have shorter life-spans than electric motors, a durability dilemma that rewards battery-making. In response, General Motors and Toyota devised strategies to mitigate this risk that involved mediating the technology of the Ovonic Battery Company.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 779-802 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Business History Review |
| Volume | 94 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 3 Feb 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Feb 2021 |
Keywords
- General Motors
- Matsushita
- Ovonic
- Toyota
- electric car
- nickel-metal hydride battery
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Public policy, industrial innovation, and the zero-emission vehicle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver