Public policy, industrial innovation, and the zero-emission vehicle

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Regulating environmental outcomes without stipulating the technologies to accomplish them is a characteristically Ameri- can form of governmental intervention. This approach aims to encourage industry to address public-policy concerns while minimizing interference in its affairs. However, California’s zero-emission-vehicle mandate of 1990 implied the develop- ment of specific technologies with highly disruptive sociotechni- cal effects. The most practical zero-emission vehicle of the day was the all-battery electric vehicle, a technology characterized by the temporal mismatch of its components. Batteries have shorter life-spans than electric motors, a durability dilemma that rewards battery-making. In response, General Motors and Toyota devised strategies to mitigate this risk that involved mediating the technology of the Ovonic Battery Company.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)779-802
Number of pages24
JournalBusiness History Review
Volume94
Issue number4
Early online date3 Feb 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Feb 2021

Keywords

  • General Motors
  • Matsushita
  • Ovonic
  • Toyota
  • electric car
  • nickel-metal hydride battery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Public policy, industrial innovation, and the zero-emission vehicle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this