Public participation and nuclear power politics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The social sciences, like all the sciences, cannot be neutral or stand apart One recent, rather unexpected, problem for Western democracies has been the rapid growth of social movements opposed to civilian nuclear power programmes and installations. Governments have commissioned and paid social scientist to advise on optimal ways of preventing the anti-nuclear opposition from delaying or halting the implementation
of nuclear power programmes.
In international terms Britain came late to the nuclear power debate, which remains muted and under-developed. So it is not surprising that British social scientists have only recently become involved as policy advisors on nuclear power. It is worthwhile looking a t the experience o f West Germany, where the nuclear power issue was politicized much earlier, to see how this policy advisor role can develop. After this I return t o Britain and examine in detail proposals for 'improving' public participation on nuclear issues put forward by Pearce, Edwards and Beuret (1979) in their recent book Decision Making f o r Energy Futures.
LanguageEnglish
Pages35-42
Number of pages8
JournalPolitics
Volume1
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1981

Fingerprint

power politics
nuclear power
participation
social scientist
Social Movements
opposition
social science
Federal Republic of Germany
democracy
energy
decision making
science
experience

Keywords

  • public participation
  • nuclear power politics

Cite this

@article{5b45d19f25ab498e8bbcf8dd4e2e83c8,
title = "Public participation and nuclear power politics",
abstract = "The social sciences, like all the sciences, cannot be neutral or stand apart One recent, rather unexpected, problem for Western democracies has been the rapid growth of social movements opposed to civilian nuclear power programmes and installations. Governments have commissioned and paid social scientist to advise on optimal ways of preventing the anti-nuclear opposition from delaying or halting the implementation of nuclear power programmes. In international terms Britain came late to the nuclear power debate, which remains muted and under-developed. So it is not surprising that British social scientists have only recently become involved as policy advisors on nuclear power. It is worthwhile looking a t the experience o f West Germany, where the nuclear power issue was politicized much earlier, to see how this policy advisor role can develop. After this I return t o Britain and examine in detail proposals for 'improving' public participation on nuclear issues put forward by Pearce, Edwards and Beuret (1979) in their recent book Decision Making f o r Energy Futures.",
keywords = "public participation , nuclear power politics",
author = "Wolfgang Rudig",
year = "1981",
month = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "35--42",
journal = "Politics",
issn = "0263-3957",
number = "2",

}

Public participation and nuclear power politics. / Rudig, Wolfgang.

In: Politics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 11.1981, p. 35-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public participation and nuclear power politics

AU - Rudig, Wolfgang

PY - 1981/11

Y1 - 1981/11

N2 - The social sciences, like all the sciences, cannot be neutral or stand apart One recent, rather unexpected, problem for Western democracies has been the rapid growth of social movements opposed to civilian nuclear power programmes and installations. Governments have commissioned and paid social scientist to advise on optimal ways of preventing the anti-nuclear opposition from delaying or halting the implementation of nuclear power programmes. In international terms Britain came late to the nuclear power debate, which remains muted and under-developed. So it is not surprising that British social scientists have only recently become involved as policy advisors on nuclear power. It is worthwhile looking a t the experience o f West Germany, where the nuclear power issue was politicized much earlier, to see how this policy advisor role can develop. After this I return t o Britain and examine in detail proposals for 'improving' public participation on nuclear issues put forward by Pearce, Edwards and Beuret (1979) in their recent book Decision Making f o r Energy Futures.

AB - The social sciences, like all the sciences, cannot be neutral or stand apart One recent, rather unexpected, problem for Western democracies has been the rapid growth of social movements opposed to civilian nuclear power programmes and installations. Governments have commissioned and paid social scientist to advise on optimal ways of preventing the anti-nuclear opposition from delaying or halting the implementation of nuclear power programmes. In international terms Britain came late to the nuclear power debate, which remains muted and under-developed. So it is not surprising that British social scientists have only recently become involved as policy advisors on nuclear power. It is worthwhile looking a t the experience o f West Germany, where the nuclear power issue was politicized much earlier, to see how this policy advisor role can develop. After this I return t o Britain and examine in detail proposals for 'improving' public participation on nuclear issues put forward by Pearce, Edwards and Beuret (1979) in their recent book Decision Making f o r Energy Futures.

KW - public participation

KW - nuclear power politics

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9256.1981.tb00057.x/pdf

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 35

EP - 42

JO - Politics

T2 - Politics

JF - Politics

SN - 0263-3957

IS - 2

ER -