Prospective organisation of neonatal arm movements: a motor foundation of embodied agency, disrupted in premature birth

Jonathan T. Delafield-Butt, Yvonne Freer, Jon Perkins, David Skulina, Ben Schögler, David N. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)
63 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Prospective motor control moves the body into the future, from where one is to where one wants to be. It is a hallmark of intentionality. But its origins in development is uncertain. In this study, we tested whether or not the arm movements of newborn infants were prospectively controlled. We measured the spatiotemporal organisation of 480 neonatal arm movements and 384 arm movements of infants prematurely born at-risk for neurodevelopmental disorder. We found 75% of healthy term-birth neonatal movements and 68% of prematurely-born infant movements conformed to the tauG-coupling model of prospective sensorimotor control. Prospective coupling values were significantly reduced in the latter (p = .010, r = .087). In both cases prospectively controlled movements were tightly organised by fixed-duration units with a base duration of 218 ms and additional temporal units of 145 ms. Yet distances remained constant. Thus, we demonstrate for the first time a precise prospective spatiotemporal organisation of neonatal arm movements and demonstrate at-risk infants exhibit reduced sensorimotor control. Prospective motor control is a hallmark of primary sensorimotor intentionality and gives a strong embodied foundation to conscious motor agency.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12693
Number of pages16
JournalDevelopmental Science
Volume21
Issue number6
Early online date19 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2018

Keywords

  • motor control
  • new born infants
  • neonatal
  • spatiotemporal organisation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective organisation of neonatal arm movements: a motor foundation of embodied agency, disrupted in premature birth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this