Prosodic variation across sampling tasks in normal and dysarthric speakers

Anja Lowit-Leuschel, Gerard J. Docherty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Speech assessments are commonly based on structured elicitation tasks. Despite the value of these tasks, the extent to which their results are a valid reflection of natural speech performance is being increasingly questioned. This is particularly warranted in the light of research findings indicating significant differences in normal speech behaviour across sampling tasks. There is, however, a paucity of research into how disordered speakers' performance varies across elicitation tasks. This study investigated ten prosodic parameters in structured and unstructured speech tasks (reading and conversation) in 12 dysarthric and 12 control subjects. The results suggest that the nature of sampling task affected dysarthric speakers differently to the control group. The implications of these findings for the assessment of disordered speakers are addressed.
LanguageEnglish
Pages151-164
Number of pages13
JournalLogopedics Phoniatrics Vocology
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2001

Fingerprint

Research
Reading
Control Groups
Sampling
Elicitation Task
Natural Speech
Control Group

Keywords

  • elicitation task
  • dysarthria
  • prosody
  • performance variability
  • phoniatrics vocology

Cite this

@article{d85d3302d88c424e9b5aee6ee9628253,
title = "Prosodic variation across sampling tasks in normal and dysarthric speakers",
abstract = "Speech assessments are commonly based on structured elicitation tasks. Despite the value of these tasks, the extent to which their results are a valid reflection of natural speech performance is being increasingly questioned. This is particularly warranted in the light of research findings indicating significant differences in normal speech behaviour across sampling tasks. There is, however, a paucity of research into how disordered speakers' performance varies across elicitation tasks. This study investigated ten prosodic parameters in structured and unstructured speech tasks (reading and conversation) in 12 dysarthric and 12 control subjects. The results suggest that the nature of sampling task affected dysarthric speakers differently to the control group. The implications of these findings for the assessment of disordered speakers are addressed.",
keywords = "elicitation task, dysarthria, prosody, performance variability, phoniatrics vocology",
author = "Anja Lowit-Leuschel and Docherty, {Gerard J.}",
year = "2001",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1080/14015430127772",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "151--164",
journal = "Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology",
issn = "1401-5439",
number = "4",

}

Prosodic variation across sampling tasks in normal and dysarthric speakers. / Lowit-Leuschel, Anja; Docherty, Gerard J.

In: Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, Vol. 26, No. 4, 12.2001, p. 151-164.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prosodic variation across sampling tasks in normal and dysarthric speakers

AU - Lowit-Leuschel, Anja

AU - Docherty, Gerard J.

PY - 2001/12

Y1 - 2001/12

N2 - Speech assessments are commonly based on structured elicitation tasks. Despite the value of these tasks, the extent to which their results are a valid reflection of natural speech performance is being increasingly questioned. This is particularly warranted in the light of research findings indicating significant differences in normal speech behaviour across sampling tasks. There is, however, a paucity of research into how disordered speakers' performance varies across elicitation tasks. This study investigated ten prosodic parameters in structured and unstructured speech tasks (reading and conversation) in 12 dysarthric and 12 control subjects. The results suggest that the nature of sampling task affected dysarthric speakers differently to the control group. The implications of these findings for the assessment of disordered speakers are addressed.

AB - Speech assessments are commonly based on structured elicitation tasks. Despite the value of these tasks, the extent to which their results are a valid reflection of natural speech performance is being increasingly questioned. This is particularly warranted in the light of research findings indicating significant differences in normal speech behaviour across sampling tasks. There is, however, a paucity of research into how disordered speakers' performance varies across elicitation tasks. This study investigated ten prosodic parameters in structured and unstructured speech tasks (reading and conversation) in 12 dysarthric and 12 control subjects. The results suggest that the nature of sampling task affected dysarthric speakers differently to the control group. The implications of these findings for the assessment of disordered speakers are addressed.

KW - elicitation task

KW - dysarthria

KW - prosody

KW - performance variability

KW - phoniatrics vocology

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14015430127772

U2 - 10.1080/14015430127772

DO - 10.1080/14015430127772

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 151

EP - 164

JO - Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology

T2 - Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology

JF - Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology

SN - 1401-5439

IS - 4

ER -