Promotion and Harmonization of Antitrust Damages Claims by Directive EU/2014/104?

Francisco Marcos, Barry Rodger, Miguel Sousa Ferro

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

Directive EU/2014/104 is the latest legal instrument that crystalizes the evolution of EU competition law enforcement. This paper assesses critically the features of the Directive and the challenges it poses for its implementation by Member States. The Directive codifies the case law of the EUCJ and it encroaches upon the autonomy of Member States in setting the institutions, remedies and procedures available for victims’ of antitrust infringements. Although the Directive provides a fragmented and incomplete set of rules that only partially harmonizes antitrust damages claims in the EU, and it’s slanted towards follow-on cartel damages claims, it has publicised the availability of damages claims, creating momentum that will transform how competition law is enforced in the future.
LanguageEnglish
Place of PublicationRochester, NY.
Number of pages42
Publication statusUnpublished - 25 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

harmonization
damages
promotion
EU
cartel
case law
law enforcement
remedies
autonomy
Law

Keywords

  • EU competition law
  • private enforcement
  • damages claims
  • harmonization
  • directives

Cite this

Marcos, Francisco ; Rodger, Barry ; Sousa Ferro, Miguel. / Promotion and Harmonization of Antitrust Damages Claims by Directive EU/2014/104?. Rochester, NY., 2018.
@techreport{6c31e734766c49deb056b92f4bb2b5c0,
title = "Promotion and Harmonization of Antitrust Damages Claims by Directive EU/2014/104?",
abstract = "Directive EU/2014/104 is the latest legal instrument that crystalizes the evolution of EU competition law enforcement. This paper assesses critically the features of the Directive and the challenges it poses for its implementation by Member States. The Directive codifies the case law of the EUCJ and it encroaches upon the autonomy of Member States in setting the institutions, remedies and procedures available for victims’ of antitrust infringements. Although the Directive provides a fragmented and incomplete set of rules that only partially harmonizes antitrust damages claims in the EU, and it’s slanted towards follow-on cartel damages claims, it has publicised the availability of damages claims, creating momentum that will transform how competition law is enforced in the future.",
keywords = "EU competition law, private enforcement, damages claims, harmonization, directives",
author = "Francisco Marcos and Barry Rodger and {Sousa Ferro}, Miguel",
note = "Preliminary Draft of Chapter 2 of The EU Antitrust Damages Directive: Transposition in the Member States (Oxford University Press, eds. B. Rodger, M.S. Ferro & F. Marcos, Forthcoming).",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "25",
language = "English",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

Promotion and Harmonization of Antitrust Damages Claims by Directive EU/2014/104? / Marcos, Francisco ; Rodger, Barry; Sousa Ferro, Miguel.

Rochester, NY., 2018.

Research output: Working paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Promotion and Harmonization of Antitrust Damages Claims by Directive EU/2014/104?

AU - Marcos, Francisco

AU - Rodger, Barry

AU - Sousa Ferro, Miguel

N1 - Preliminary Draft of Chapter 2 of The EU Antitrust Damages Directive: Transposition in the Member States (Oxford University Press, eds. B. Rodger, M.S. Ferro & F. Marcos, Forthcoming).

PY - 2018/8/25

Y1 - 2018/8/25

N2 - Directive EU/2014/104 is the latest legal instrument that crystalizes the evolution of EU competition law enforcement. This paper assesses critically the features of the Directive and the challenges it poses for its implementation by Member States. The Directive codifies the case law of the EUCJ and it encroaches upon the autonomy of Member States in setting the institutions, remedies and procedures available for victims’ of antitrust infringements. Although the Directive provides a fragmented and incomplete set of rules that only partially harmonizes antitrust damages claims in the EU, and it’s slanted towards follow-on cartel damages claims, it has publicised the availability of damages claims, creating momentum that will transform how competition law is enforced in the future.

AB - Directive EU/2014/104 is the latest legal instrument that crystalizes the evolution of EU competition law enforcement. This paper assesses critically the features of the Directive and the challenges it poses for its implementation by Member States. The Directive codifies the case law of the EUCJ and it encroaches upon the autonomy of Member States in setting the institutions, remedies and procedures available for victims’ of antitrust infringements. Although the Directive provides a fragmented and incomplete set of rules that only partially harmonizes antitrust damages claims in the EU, and it’s slanted towards follow-on cartel damages claims, it has publicised the availability of damages claims, creating momentum that will transform how competition law is enforced in the future.

KW - EU competition law

KW - private enforcement

KW - damages claims

KW - harmonization

KW - directives

UR - https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3224202

M3 - Working paper

BT - Promotion and Harmonization of Antitrust Damages Claims by Directive EU/2014/104?

CY - Rochester, NY.

ER -