Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review

David Ogilvie, Matt Egan, Val Hamilton, Mark Petticrew

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

237 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives To assess what interventions are effective in promoting a population shift from using cars towards walking and cycling and to assess the health effects of such interventions. Data sources Published and unpublished reports in any language identified from electronic databases, bibliographies, websites, and reference lists. Review methods Systematic search and appraisal to identify experimental or observational studies with a prospective or controlled retrospective design that evaluated any intervention applied to an urban population or area by measuring outcomes in members of the local population. Results 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. We found some evidence that targeted behaviour change programmes can change the behaviour of motivated subgroups, resulting (in the largest study) in a shift of around 5% of all trips at a population level. Single studies of commuter subsidies and a new railway station also showed positive effects. The balance of best available evidence about publicity campaigns, engineering measures, and other interventions suggests that they have not been effective. Participants in trials of active commuting experienced short term improvements in certain measures of health and fitness, but we found no good evidence on effects on health of any effective intervention at population level. Conclusions The best available evidence of effectiveness in promoting a modal shift is for targeted behaviour change programmes, but the social distribution of their effects is unclear and some other types of intervention have yet to be rigorously evaluated.
LanguageEnglish
Pages763-766
Number of pages3
JournalBritish Medical Journal
Volume329
Issue number7469
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2004

Fingerprint

Walking
Population
Health
Urban Population
Information Storage and Retrieval
Bibliography
Observational Studies
Language
Databases

Keywords

  • health promotion
  • transport
  • systematic review
  • urban population
  • behaviour

Cite this

Ogilvie, David ; Egan, Matt ; Hamilton, Val ; Petticrew, Mark. / Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review. In: British Medical Journal. 2004 ; Vol. 329, No. 7469. pp. 763-766.
@article{b7a452b1623b4df4bf99c715d49571f8,
title = "Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review",
abstract = "Objectives To assess what interventions are effective in promoting a population shift from using cars towards walking and cycling and to assess the health effects of such interventions. Data sources Published and unpublished reports in any language identified from electronic databases, bibliographies, websites, and reference lists. Review methods Systematic search and appraisal to identify experimental or observational studies with a prospective or controlled retrospective design that evaluated any intervention applied to an urban population or area by measuring outcomes in members of the local population. Results 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. We found some evidence that targeted behaviour change programmes can change the behaviour of motivated subgroups, resulting (in the largest study) in a shift of around 5{\%} of all trips at a population level. Single studies of commuter subsidies and a new railway station also showed positive effects. The balance of best available evidence about publicity campaigns, engineering measures, and other interventions suggests that they have not been effective. Participants in trials of active commuting experienced short term improvements in certain measures of health and fitness, but we found no good evidence on effects on health of any effective intervention at population level. Conclusions The best available evidence of effectiveness in promoting a modal shift is for targeted behaviour change programmes, but the social distribution of their effects is unclear and some other types of intervention have yet to be rigorously evaluated.",
keywords = "health promotion, transport, systematic review, urban population, behaviour",
author = "David Ogilvie and Matt Egan and Val Hamilton and Mark Petticrew",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1136/bmj.38216.714560.55",
language = "English",
volume = "329",
pages = "763--766",
journal = "BMJ",
issn = "0959-8138",
number = "7469",

}

Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review. / Ogilvie, David; Egan, Matt; Hamilton, Val; Petticrew, Mark.

In: British Medical Journal, Vol. 329, No. 7469, 02.10.2004, p. 763-766.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review

AU - Ogilvie, David

AU - Egan, Matt

AU - Hamilton, Val

AU - Petticrew, Mark

PY - 2004/10/2

Y1 - 2004/10/2

N2 - Objectives To assess what interventions are effective in promoting a population shift from using cars towards walking and cycling and to assess the health effects of such interventions. Data sources Published and unpublished reports in any language identified from electronic databases, bibliographies, websites, and reference lists. Review methods Systematic search and appraisal to identify experimental or observational studies with a prospective or controlled retrospective design that evaluated any intervention applied to an urban population or area by measuring outcomes in members of the local population. Results 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. We found some evidence that targeted behaviour change programmes can change the behaviour of motivated subgroups, resulting (in the largest study) in a shift of around 5% of all trips at a population level. Single studies of commuter subsidies and a new railway station also showed positive effects. The balance of best available evidence about publicity campaigns, engineering measures, and other interventions suggests that they have not been effective. Participants in trials of active commuting experienced short term improvements in certain measures of health and fitness, but we found no good evidence on effects on health of any effective intervention at population level. Conclusions The best available evidence of effectiveness in promoting a modal shift is for targeted behaviour change programmes, but the social distribution of their effects is unclear and some other types of intervention have yet to be rigorously evaluated.

AB - Objectives To assess what interventions are effective in promoting a population shift from using cars towards walking and cycling and to assess the health effects of such interventions. Data sources Published and unpublished reports in any language identified from electronic databases, bibliographies, websites, and reference lists. Review methods Systematic search and appraisal to identify experimental or observational studies with a prospective or controlled retrospective design that evaluated any intervention applied to an urban population or area by measuring outcomes in members of the local population. Results 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. We found some evidence that targeted behaviour change programmes can change the behaviour of motivated subgroups, resulting (in the largest study) in a shift of around 5% of all trips at a population level. Single studies of commuter subsidies and a new railway station also showed positive effects. The balance of best available evidence about publicity campaigns, engineering measures, and other interventions suggests that they have not been effective. Participants in trials of active commuting experienced short term improvements in certain measures of health and fitness, but we found no good evidence on effects on health of any effective intervention at population level. Conclusions The best available evidence of effectiveness in promoting a modal shift is for targeted behaviour change programmes, but the social distribution of their effects is unclear and some other types of intervention have yet to be rigorously evaluated.

KW - health promotion

KW - transport

KW - systematic review

KW - urban population

KW - behaviour

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.38216.714560.55

DO - 10.1136/bmj.38216.714560.55

M3 - Article

VL - 329

SP - 763

EP - 766

JO - BMJ

T2 - BMJ

JF - BMJ

SN - 0959-8138

IS - 7469

ER -