Professionalism and partnership: panaceas for teacher education in Scotland?

Aileen Kennedy, Robert Doherty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A critical reading of the Donaldson Report on teacher education in Scotland reveals what might be termed a ‘panacea approach’ to addressing perceived current problems in relation to the quality of teacher education. In particular, the essence of the Donaldson Report is that teachers need to embrace ‘twenty-first century professionalism’ through a partnership approach to teacher education. However, neither ‘professionalism’, nor ‘partnership’ are defined or justified explicitly. Through critical discourse analysis we offer possible interpretations of professionalism and partnership within the context of the Donaldson Report. These interpretations include accepting the use of such terms as simple unconscious and uncritical adherence to a dominant discourse, and the idea that the wholesale embracing of partnership is a much more insidious attempt by the state to promote network governance, thereby limiting potential dominance of any one particular stakeholder group. Through systematic consideration of the immediate textual context of phrases relating to professionalism and partnership, and through a more holistic analysis of the wider policy agenda, we offer a critical reading of the Report. We conclude with a plea that as the rush to attend to the more tangible, operational aspects of the proposed reform gather momentum, such a panacea approach to solving perceived problems needs to be critiqued openly.
LanguageEnglish
Pages835-848
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Education Policy
Volume27
Issue number6
Early online date19 Jun 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

teacher
education
interpretation
discourse analysis
twenty-first century
stakeholder
professionalism
governance
reform
discourse
Group

Keywords

  • Donaldson Review
  • teacher education
  • network governance
  • policy panaceas
  • partnership
  • professionalism

Cite this

Kennedy, Aileen ; Doherty, Robert. / Professionalism and partnership : panaceas for teacher education in Scotland?. In: Journal of Education Policy. 2012 ; Vol. 27, No. 6. pp. 835-848.
@article{fce5c8c90cdd4346ac97c62f4fcda803,
title = "Professionalism and partnership: panaceas for teacher education in Scotland?",
abstract = "A critical reading of the Donaldson Report on teacher education in Scotland reveals what might be termed a ‘panacea approach’ to addressing perceived current problems in relation to the quality of teacher education. In particular, the essence of the Donaldson Report is that teachers need to embrace ‘twenty-first century professionalism’ through a partnership approach to teacher education. However, neither ‘professionalism’, nor ‘partnership’ are defined or justified explicitly. Through critical discourse analysis we offer possible interpretations of professionalism and partnership within the context of the Donaldson Report. These interpretations include accepting the use of such terms as simple unconscious and uncritical adherence to a dominant discourse, and the idea that the wholesale embracing of partnership is a much more insidious attempt by the state to promote network governance, thereby limiting potential dominance of any one particular stakeholder group. Through systematic consideration of the immediate textual context of phrases relating to professionalism and partnership, and through a more holistic analysis of the wider policy agenda, we offer a critical reading of the Report. We conclude with a plea that as the rush to attend to the more tangible, operational aspects of the proposed reform gather momentum, such a panacea approach to solving perceived problems needs to be critiqued openly.",
keywords = "Donaldson Review, teacher education, network governance, policy panaceas, partnership, professionalism",
author = "Aileen Kennedy and Robert Doherty",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/02680939.2012.682609",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "835--848",
journal = "Journal of Educational Policy",
issn = "0268-0939",
number = "6",

}

Professionalism and partnership : panaceas for teacher education in Scotland? / Kennedy, Aileen; Doherty, Robert.

In: Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2012, p. 835-848.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Professionalism and partnership

T2 - Journal of Educational Policy

AU - Kennedy, Aileen

AU - Doherty, Robert

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - A critical reading of the Donaldson Report on teacher education in Scotland reveals what might be termed a ‘panacea approach’ to addressing perceived current problems in relation to the quality of teacher education. In particular, the essence of the Donaldson Report is that teachers need to embrace ‘twenty-first century professionalism’ through a partnership approach to teacher education. However, neither ‘professionalism’, nor ‘partnership’ are defined or justified explicitly. Through critical discourse analysis we offer possible interpretations of professionalism and partnership within the context of the Donaldson Report. These interpretations include accepting the use of such terms as simple unconscious and uncritical adherence to a dominant discourse, and the idea that the wholesale embracing of partnership is a much more insidious attempt by the state to promote network governance, thereby limiting potential dominance of any one particular stakeholder group. Through systematic consideration of the immediate textual context of phrases relating to professionalism and partnership, and through a more holistic analysis of the wider policy agenda, we offer a critical reading of the Report. We conclude with a plea that as the rush to attend to the more tangible, operational aspects of the proposed reform gather momentum, such a panacea approach to solving perceived problems needs to be critiqued openly.

AB - A critical reading of the Donaldson Report on teacher education in Scotland reveals what might be termed a ‘panacea approach’ to addressing perceived current problems in relation to the quality of teacher education. In particular, the essence of the Donaldson Report is that teachers need to embrace ‘twenty-first century professionalism’ through a partnership approach to teacher education. However, neither ‘professionalism’, nor ‘partnership’ are defined or justified explicitly. Through critical discourse analysis we offer possible interpretations of professionalism and partnership within the context of the Donaldson Report. These interpretations include accepting the use of such terms as simple unconscious and uncritical adherence to a dominant discourse, and the idea that the wholesale embracing of partnership is a much more insidious attempt by the state to promote network governance, thereby limiting potential dominance of any one particular stakeholder group. Through systematic consideration of the immediate textual context of phrases relating to professionalism and partnership, and through a more holistic analysis of the wider policy agenda, we offer a critical reading of the Report. We conclude with a plea that as the rush to attend to the more tangible, operational aspects of the proposed reform gather momentum, such a panacea approach to solving perceived problems needs to be critiqued openly.

KW - Donaldson Review

KW - teacher education

KW - network governance

KW - policy panaceas

KW - partnership

KW - professionalism

U2 - 10.1080/02680939.2012.682609

DO - 10.1080/02680939.2012.682609

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 835

EP - 848

JO - Journal of Educational Policy

JF - Journal of Educational Policy

SN - 0268-0939

IS - 6

ER -