Process research in strategy formation: theory, methodology, and relevance

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    57 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper develops a view of the strategy formation process, drawing on a review of contributions that are based on a process approach, and more specifically the work of Henry Mintzberg, Andrew Pettigrew and Andrew Van de Ven. This view is meant to provide a way to bridge the content–process gap in strategic management by addressing the aspects of process theory and process methodology. Structuration is found to provide a useful theoretical basis for strategy formation research. Process methodology is found to be about discovering valid generative mechanisms that explain regular patterns in event sequences. Strategy formation research can then be made relevant for management practice by providing insight with regard to generative mechanisms and associated process trajectories of continuity and change, to allow for judgements on the favourability of the course of the process as well as the necessity to intervene or to let the process run its course.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages97-125
    Number of pages29
    JournalInternational Journal of Management Reviews
    Volume11
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2009

    Fingerprint

    Trajectories
    Strategy formation
    Process research
    Methodology
    Continuity
    Process approach
    Strategic management
    Structuration
    Management practices
    Trajectory
    Process theory

    Keywords

    • process research
    • strategy formation
    • theory
    • methodology
    • relevance
    • strategy formation process
    • content–process gap
    • strategic management

    Cite this

    @article{48852267bec0462cbc4c3f432f12a446,
    title = "Process research in strategy formation: theory, methodology, and relevance",
    abstract = "This paper develops a view of the strategy formation process, drawing on a review of contributions that are based on a process approach, and more specifically the work of Henry Mintzberg, Andrew Pettigrew and Andrew Van de Ven. This view is meant to provide a way to bridge the content–process gap in strategic management by addressing the aspects of process theory and process methodology. Structuration is found to provide a useful theoretical basis for strategy formation research. Process methodology is found to be about discovering valid generative mechanisms that explain regular patterns in event sequences. Strategy formation research can then be made relevant for management practice by providing insight with regard to generative mechanisms and associated process trajectories of continuity and change, to allow for judgements on the favourability of the course of the process as well as the necessity to intervene or to let the process run its course.",
    keywords = "process research, strategy formation, theory, methodology, relevance, strategy formation process, content–process gap , strategic management",
    author = "Harry Sminia",
    year = "2009",
    month = "3",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00253.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "11",
    pages = "97--125",
    journal = "International Journal of Management Reviews",
    issn = "1460-8545",
    number = "1",

    }

    Process research in strategy formation : theory, methodology, and relevance. / Sminia, Harry.

    In: International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 11, No. 1, 03.2009, p. 97-125.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Process research in strategy formation

    T2 - International Journal of Management Reviews

    AU - Sminia, Harry

    PY - 2009/3

    Y1 - 2009/3

    N2 - This paper develops a view of the strategy formation process, drawing on a review of contributions that are based on a process approach, and more specifically the work of Henry Mintzberg, Andrew Pettigrew and Andrew Van de Ven. This view is meant to provide a way to bridge the content–process gap in strategic management by addressing the aspects of process theory and process methodology. Structuration is found to provide a useful theoretical basis for strategy formation research. Process methodology is found to be about discovering valid generative mechanisms that explain regular patterns in event sequences. Strategy formation research can then be made relevant for management practice by providing insight with regard to generative mechanisms and associated process trajectories of continuity and change, to allow for judgements on the favourability of the course of the process as well as the necessity to intervene or to let the process run its course.

    AB - This paper develops a view of the strategy formation process, drawing on a review of contributions that are based on a process approach, and more specifically the work of Henry Mintzberg, Andrew Pettigrew and Andrew Van de Ven. This view is meant to provide a way to bridge the content–process gap in strategic management by addressing the aspects of process theory and process methodology. Structuration is found to provide a useful theoretical basis for strategy formation research. Process methodology is found to be about discovering valid generative mechanisms that explain regular patterns in event sequences. Strategy formation research can then be made relevant for management practice by providing insight with regard to generative mechanisms and associated process trajectories of continuity and change, to allow for judgements on the favourability of the course of the process as well as the necessity to intervene or to let the process run its course.

    KW - process research

    KW - strategy formation

    KW - theory

    KW - methodology

    KW - relevance

    KW - strategy formation process

    KW - content–process gap

    KW - strategic management

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00253.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00253.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 11

    SP - 97

    EP - 125

    JO - International Journal of Management Reviews

    JF - International Journal of Management Reviews

    SN - 1460-8545

    IS - 1

    ER -