Privatisation

Jim Stevens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For many politicians and academic commentators privatisation has implications reaching far beyond the mere transfer of ownership. Conservative governments have in the past introduced denationalisation programmes although never on the present grand scale. As Simpson (1984) and others have pointed out, the Government and its supporters often fail to distinguish between the effects of denationalisation and the benefits of liberalisation. It is a widely held view that nationalised industries are less efficient than private companies. Although Heald & Steel (1982) are doubtful about this proposition the essence of their argument can be summarised as follows: "public enterprises are intrinsically less efficient than private enterprises because they are insulated from the disciplines of the capital and product markets" (p.339). It is at this point that the distinction between liberalisation and denationalisation must be drawn and this economic perspective will attempt to delineate the reasons why.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-68
Number of pages3
JournalQuarterly Economic Commentary
Volume10
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1984

Keywords

  • privatisation
  • liberalisation
  • denationalisation
  • British economy
  • public enterprise
  • private enterprise

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Privatisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Stevens, J. (1984). Privatisation. Quarterly Economic Commentary, 10(1), 66-68.