Private enforcement and collective redress: the benefits of empirical research and comparative approaches

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

It is clear from a cursory examination of the academic literature in the field that private enforcement is an established, well-developed and vibrant mode of enforcement of US antitrust law constituting the preponderance of antitrust enforcement activity; complemented by public enforcement by the DOJ and FTC.
Historically, a range of factors have combined to ensure that private enforcement is effectively the default setting for antitrust enforcement in general, namely: the wider litigative culture; the significant period of development of antitrust law and economics; and, specific characteristics of US civil procedure - the rules on discovery, the funding of actions, the availability of class actions, and the existence of treble damages actions - together with clarification (and modification) of the legal position in relation to issues such as the
passing-on defence and standing for indirect purchasers. Private antitrust enforcement is a well developed and mature system of litigation in the US, in contrast with the position in the EU.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalCompetition Law Review
Volume8
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • private enforcement
  • antitrust law
  • EU law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Private enforcement and collective redress: the benefits of empirical research and comparative approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this