Privacy in automation: an appraisal of the emerging Australian approach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article presents an initial appraisal of the emerging Australian approach to applying privacy and data protection laws to automated technologies. These laws and the general context in which they operate will be explained, with appropriate comparisons made to the European Union frameworks. In order to examine their specific application vis-à-vis automated technologies, three case studies – automated facial recognition technologies (AFRT), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs – better known as ‘drones’) and autonomous vehicles (or ‘driverless cars’) – are selected to examine the extent to which existing privacy and data protection laws, and their application, can be considered adequate to address privacy and data protection risks that these technologies bring. These case studies evidence existing deficiencies with privacy protection in Australia and the inadequacy of recent reform processes, demonstrating that Australian data privacy laws are not well placed to protect individuals' rights vis-à-vis automated technologies.

LanguageEnglish
Pages836-846
Number of pages11
JournalComputer Law and Security Review
Volume33
Issue number6
Early online date31 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

automation
Data privacy
privacy
Automation
data protection
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV)
Law
privacy law
Railroad cars
Privacy
reform
evidence
Data protection

Keywords

  • Australia
  • data protection
  • driverless cars
  • drones
  • facial recognition
  • privacy

Cite this

@article{df38f313526c4026a8284d032a2fef54,
title = "Privacy in automation: an appraisal of the emerging Australian approach",
abstract = "This article presents an initial appraisal of the emerging Australian approach to applying privacy and data protection laws to automated technologies. These laws and the general context in which they operate will be explained, with appropriate comparisons made to the European Union frameworks. In order to examine their specific application vis-{\`a}-vis automated technologies, three case studies – automated facial recognition technologies (AFRT), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs – better known as ‘drones’) and autonomous vehicles (or ‘driverless cars’) – are selected to examine the extent to which existing privacy and data protection laws, and their application, can be considered adequate to address privacy and data protection risks that these technologies bring. These case studies evidence existing deficiencies with privacy protection in Australia and the inadequacy of recent reform processes, demonstrating that Australian data privacy laws are not well placed to protect individuals' rights vis-{\`a}-vis automated technologies.",
keywords = "Australia, data protection, driverless cars, drones, facial recognition, privacy",
author = "Angela Daly",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.clsr.2017.05.009",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "836--846",
journal = "Computer Law and Security Review",
issn = "0267-3649",
number = "6",

}

Privacy in automation : an appraisal of the emerging Australian approach. / Daly, Angela.

In: Computer Law and Security Review, Vol. 33, No. 6, 31.12.2017, p. 836-846.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Privacy in automation

T2 - Computer Law and Security Review

AU - Daly, Angela

PY - 2017/12/31

Y1 - 2017/12/31

N2 - This article presents an initial appraisal of the emerging Australian approach to applying privacy and data protection laws to automated technologies. These laws and the general context in which they operate will be explained, with appropriate comparisons made to the European Union frameworks. In order to examine their specific application vis-à-vis automated technologies, three case studies – automated facial recognition technologies (AFRT), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs – better known as ‘drones’) and autonomous vehicles (or ‘driverless cars’) – are selected to examine the extent to which existing privacy and data protection laws, and their application, can be considered adequate to address privacy and data protection risks that these technologies bring. These case studies evidence existing deficiencies with privacy protection in Australia and the inadequacy of recent reform processes, demonstrating that Australian data privacy laws are not well placed to protect individuals' rights vis-à-vis automated technologies.

AB - This article presents an initial appraisal of the emerging Australian approach to applying privacy and data protection laws to automated technologies. These laws and the general context in which they operate will be explained, with appropriate comparisons made to the European Union frameworks. In order to examine their specific application vis-à-vis automated technologies, three case studies – automated facial recognition technologies (AFRT), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs – better known as ‘drones’) and autonomous vehicles (or ‘driverless cars’) – are selected to examine the extent to which existing privacy and data protection laws, and their application, can be considered adequate to address privacy and data protection risks that these technologies bring. These case studies evidence existing deficiencies with privacy protection in Australia and the inadequacy of recent reform processes, demonstrating that Australian data privacy laws are not well placed to protect individuals' rights vis-à-vis automated technologies.

KW - Australia

KW - data protection

KW - driverless cars

KW - drones

KW - facial recognition

KW - privacy

U2 - 10.1016/j.clsr.2017.05.009

DO - 10.1016/j.clsr.2017.05.009

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 836

EP - 846

JO - Computer Law and Security Review

JF - Computer Law and Security Review

SN - 0267-3649

IS - 6

ER -