Price Flexibility and Full Employment: Barking up the Wrong (Neoclassical) Tree

Roy H Grieve

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper (a revised version of Strathclyde Paper 2004-07) questions the thesis (again in fashion) that price flexibility ensures full employment. (See most standard macro textbooks.) We make the point that explanation of unemployment in terms of price/wage stickiness typified much preKeynesian analysis, but not Keynes’s theory of involuntary unemployment. Under uncertainty - an essential aspect of the Keynes conception - no set of prices consistent with full employment may actually exist: if so, price inflexibility is not the critical obstacle to the attainment of full employment. Finally, with respect to current use of the AD/AS model, we note that once-rejected ideas have returned to the mainstream and that the strong arguments against attribution of necessarily beneficent effects to price and wage flexibility, which ought to be well-known, seem now to be forgotten.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationGlasgow
PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
Pages1-42
Number of pages42
Volume16
Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • price adjustment - the rate of interest, wages, the price level
  • classical and keynesian perspectives
  • counting equations and unknowns
  • the ADAS model

Cite this

Grieve, R. H. (2016). Price Flexibility and Full Employment: Barking up the Wrong (Neoclassical) Tree. (01 ed.) (pp. 1-42). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.