Preparing for the future: development of an ‘antifragile’ methodology that complements scenario planning by omitting causation

James Derbyshire, George Wright

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    27 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Abstract This paper demonstrates that the Intuitive Logics method of scenario planning emphasises the causal unfolding of future events and that this emphasis limits its ability to aid preparation for the future, for example by giving a misleading impression as to the usefulness of ‘weak signals’ or ‘early warnings’. We argue for the benefits of an alternative method that views uncertainty as originating from indeterminism. We develop and illustrate an ‘antifragile’ approach to preparing for the future and present it as a step-by-step, non-deterministic methodology that can be used as a replacement for, or as a complement to, the causally-focused approach of scenario planning.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages215-225
    Number of pages11
    JournalTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
    Volume82
    Early online date16 Aug 2013
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

    Fingerprint

    Causality
    Planning
    Uncertainty
    Scenario planning
    Causation
    Methodology
    Preparation
    Weak signal
    Logic
    Early warning
    Usefulness
    Replacement

    Keywords

    • scenario planning
    • intuitive Logics
    • causality
    • indeterminism
    • fragility
    • uncertainty

    Cite this

    @article{ae3dd1fe9a004a3da0b9d1998dfc7c2b,
    title = "Preparing for the future: development of an ‘antifragile’ methodology that complements scenario planning by omitting causation",
    abstract = "Abstract This paper demonstrates that the Intuitive Logics method of scenario planning emphasises the causal unfolding of future events and that this emphasis limits its ability to aid preparation for the future, for example by giving a misleading impression as to the usefulness of ‘weak signals’ or ‘early warnings’. We argue for the benefits of an alternative method that views uncertainty as originating from indeterminism. We develop and illustrate an ‘antifragile’ approach to preparing for the future and present it as a step-by-step, non-deterministic methodology that can be used as a replacement for, or as a complement to, the causally-focused approach of scenario planning.",
    keywords = "scenario planning, intuitive Logics, causality, indeterminism, fragility, uncertainty",
    author = "James Derbyshire and George Wright",
    year = "2014",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1016/j.techfore.2013.07.001",
    language = "English",
    volume = "82",
    pages = "215--225",
    journal = "Technological Forecasting and Social Change",
    issn = "0040-1625",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Preparing for the future

    T2 - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

    AU - Derbyshire, James

    AU - Wright, George

    PY - 2014/2

    Y1 - 2014/2

    N2 - Abstract This paper demonstrates that the Intuitive Logics method of scenario planning emphasises the causal unfolding of future events and that this emphasis limits its ability to aid preparation for the future, for example by giving a misleading impression as to the usefulness of ‘weak signals’ or ‘early warnings’. We argue for the benefits of an alternative method that views uncertainty as originating from indeterminism. We develop and illustrate an ‘antifragile’ approach to preparing for the future and present it as a step-by-step, non-deterministic methodology that can be used as a replacement for, or as a complement to, the causally-focused approach of scenario planning.

    AB - Abstract This paper demonstrates that the Intuitive Logics method of scenario planning emphasises the causal unfolding of future events and that this emphasis limits its ability to aid preparation for the future, for example by giving a misleading impression as to the usefulness of ‘weak signals’ or ‘early warnings’. We argue for the benefits of an alternative method that views uncertainty as originating from indeterminism. We develop and illustrate an ‘antifragile’ approach to preparing for the future and present it as a step-by-step, non-deterministic methodology that can be used as a replacement for, or as a complement to, the causally-focused approach of scenario planning.

    KW - scenario planning

    KW - intuitive Logics

    KW - causality

    KW - indeterminism

    KW - fragility

    KW - uncertainty

    UR - http://www.journals.elsevier.com/technological-forecasting-and-social-change/

    U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.07.001

    DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.07.001

    M3 - Article

    VL - 82

    SP - 215

    EP - 225

    JO - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

    JF - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

    SN - 0040-1625

    ER -