Practitioner research in social work: a knowledge review

Fiona Mitchell, Neil Lunt, Ian Shaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reports what may be the first systematic mapping and review of practitioner research studies in social work. We reflect on the difficulties of identifying such studies and outline the review and mapping processes adopted in the study. The paper categorises the kinds of research undertaken, drawing on a recently developed framework; it also reports and assesses the research against its contribution to knowledge, its methodological standards and its pursuit of due ethical research process. Finally, the paper explores what is known regarding the utility of the research, its contribution to capacity building and its value for people, and closes with a discussion of the issues raised by the review.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7-31
Number of pages25
JournalEvidence and Policy
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

social work
research process
Values

Keywords

  • classifying research
  • knowledge review
  • practitioner research
  • social work

Cite this

Mitchell, Fiona ; Lunt, Neil ; Shaw, Ian. / Practitioner research in social work : a knowledge review. In: Evidence and Policy. 2010 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 7-31.
@article{8e8ea070e9df472b8aedf1c1f307341b,
title = "Practitioner research in social work: a knowledge review",
abstract = "This article reports what may be the first systematic mapping and review of practitioner research studies in social work. We reflect on the difficulties of identifying such studies and outline the review and mapping processes adopted in the study. The paper categorises the kinds of research undertaken, drawing on a recently developed framework; it also reports and assesses the research against its contribution to knowledge, its methodological standards and its pursuit of due ethical research process. Finally, the paper explores what is known regarding the utility of the research, its contribution to capacity building and its value for people, and closes with a discussion of the issues raised by the review.",
keywords = "classifying research, knowledge review, practitioner research, social work",
author = "Fiona Mitchell and Neil Lunt and Ian Shaw",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1332/174426410X482971",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "7--31",
journal = "Evidence and Policy",
issn = "1744-2648",
number = "1",

}

Practitioner research in social work : a knowledge review. / Mitchell, Fiona; Lunt, Neil; Shaw, Ian.

In: Evidence and Policy, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 7-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practitioner research in social work

T2 - a knowledge review

AU - Mitchell, Fiona

AU - Lunt, Neil

AU - Shaw, Ian

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - This article reports what may be the first systematic mapping and review of practitioner research studies in social work. We reflect on the difficulties of identifying such studies and outline the review and mapping processes adopted in the study. The paper categorises the kinds of research undertaken, drawing on a recently developed framework; it also reports and assesses the research against its contribution to knowledge, its methodological standards and its pursuit of due ethical research process. Finally, the paper explores what is known regarding the utility of the research, its contribution to capacity building and its value for people, and closes with a discussion of the issues raised by the review.

AB - This article reports what may be the first systematic mapping and review of practitioner research studies in social work. We reflect on the difficulties of identifying such studies and outline the review and mapping processes adopted in the study. The paper categorises the kinds of research undertaken, drawing on a recently developed framework; it also reports and assesses the research against its contribution to knowledge, its methodological standards and its pursuit of due ethical research process. Finally, the paper explores what is known regarding the utility of the research, its contribution to capacity building and its value for people, and closes with a discussion of the issues raised by the review.

KW - classifying research

KW - knowledge review

KW - practitioner research

KW - social work

U2 - 10.1332/174426410X482971

DO - 10.1332/174426410X482971

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 7

EP - 31

JO - Evidence and Policy

JF - Evidence and Policy

SN - 1744-2648

IS - 1

ER -