Potential risk of vapour cloud explosion in FLNG liquefaction modules

Sayyoon Park, Byongug Jeong, Byung Suk Lee, Selda Oterkus, Peilin Zhou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Floating Production Storage and Offloading vessels have been in operation for four decades and there are now well over 250 vessels in existence, but their gas equivalent floating liquid natural gas plants kwon as FLNGs are still very new. Consequently designs and arrangement of top-side process units are still evolving and their safety has yet to be fully and objectively evaluated. This paper explores the probability of occurrence of accidents leading to vapour cloud explosion at one of the topside liquefaction modules of an FLNG. The worst possible scenario with the maximum tolerable probability is identified and the impact of the corresponding vapour cloud explosion is estimated. The strength of the structures supporting the neighbouring modules was examined using finite element analysis to determine if the accident has a potential of escalating to neighbouring modules.
It is found that the current levels of safety gaps between the liquefaction modules may be insufficient for the structural arrangement in place. It is thought that a new structural design using circular pipes as the structural elements instead of the I-beams may enhance the integrity of the top-side supporting structures against the impact of potential vapour cloud explosion. The effectiveness of the new structure is demonstrated by comparing it to the conventional supporting structure using I-beam members. This also implies that, by using pipe elements, the safety gaps can be reduced, thus making it possible to optimise the topside arrangement more easily.
LanguageEnglish
Pages423-437
Number of pages5
JournalOcean Engineering
Volume149
Early online date7 Sep 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Liquefaction
Explosions
Vapors
Accidents
Pipe
Gas plants
Structural design
Chemical reactions
Natural gas
Finite element method
Liquids
Gases
Floating liquefied natural gas

Keywords

  • FLNG
  • risk assessment
  • safety
  • safety gap
  • structural strength
  • vapour cloud explosion
  • safety evaluation

Cite this

@article{ce9ee0fe3047477885048373eec042d3,
title = "Potential risk of vapour cloud explosion in FLNG liquefaction modules",
abstract = "Floating Production Storage and Offloading vessels have been in operation for four decades and there are now well over 250 vessels in existence, but their gas equivalent floating liquid natural gas plants kwon as FLNGs are still very new. Consequently designs and arrangement of top-side process units are still evolving and their safety has yet to be fully and objectively evaluated. This paper explores the probability of occurrence of accidents leading to vapour cloud explosion at one of the topside liquefaction modules of an FLNG. The worst possible scenario with the maximum tolerable probability is identified and the impact of the corresponding vapour cloud explosion is estimated. The strength of the structures supporting the neighbouring modules was examined using finite element analysis to determine if the accident has a potential of escalating to neighbouring modules.It is found that the current levels of safety gaps between the liquefaction modules may be insufficient for the structural arrangement in place. It is thought that a new structural design using circular pipes as the structural elements instead of the I-beams may enhance the integrity of the top-side supporting structures against the impact of potential vapour cloud explosion. The effectiveness of the new structure is demonstrated by comparing it to the conventional supporting structure using I-beam members. This also implies that, by using pipe elements, the safety gaps can be reduced, thus making it possible to optimise the topside arrangement more easily.",
keywords = "FLNG, risk assessment, safety, safety gap, structural strength, vapour cloud explosion, safety evaluation",
author = "Sayyoon Park and Byongug Jeong and Lee, {Byung Suk} and Selda Oterkus and Peilin Zhou",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.08.032",
language = "English",
volume = "149",
pages = "423--437",
journal = "Ocean Engineering",
issn = "0029-8018",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Potential risk of vapour cloud explosion in FLNG liquefaction modules. / Park, Sayyoon; Jeong, Byongug; Lee, Byung Suk; Oterkus, Selda; Zhou, Peilin.

In: Ocean Engineering, Vol. 149, 01.02.2018, p. 423-437.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential risk of vapour cloud explosion in FLNG liquefaction modules

AU - Park, Sayyoon

AU - Jeong, Byongug

AU - Lee, Byung Suk

AU - Oterkus, Selda

AU - Zhou, Peilin

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Floating Production Storage and Offloading vessels have been in operation for four decades and there are now well over 250 vessels in existence, but their gas equivalent floating liquid natural gas plants kwon as FLNGs are still very new. Consequently designs and arrangement of top-side process units are still evolving and their safety has yet to be fully and objectively evaluated. This paper explores the probability of occurrence of accidents leading to vapour cloud explosion at one of the topside liquefaction modules of an FLNG. The worst possible scenario with the maximum tolerable probability is identified and the impact of the corresponding vapour cloud explosion is estimated. The strength of the structures supporting the neighbouring modules was examined using finite element analysis to determine if the accident has a potential of escalating to neighbouring modules.It is found that the current levels of safety gaps between the liquefaction modules may be insufficient for the structural arrangement in place. It is thought that a new structural design using circular pipes as the structural elements instead of the I-beams may enhance the integrity of the top-side supporting structures against the impact of potential vapour cloud explosion. The effectiveness of the new structure is demonstrated by comparing it to the conventional supporting structure using I-beam members. This also implies that, by using pipe elements, the safety gaps can be reduced, thus making it possible to optimise the topside arrangement more easily.

AB - Floating Production Storage and Offloading vessels have been in operation for four decades and there are now well over 250 vessels in existence, but their gas equivalent floating liquid natural gas plants kwon as FLNGs are still very new. Consequently designs and arrangement of top-side process units are still evolving and their safety has yet to be fully and objectively evaluated. This paper explores the probability of occurrence of accidents leading to vapour cloud explosion at one of the topside liquefaction modules of an FLNG. The worst possible scenario with the maximum tolerable probability is identified and the impact of the corresponding vapour cloud explosion is estimated. The strength of the structures supporting the neighbouring modules was examined using finite element analysis to determine if the accident has a potential of escalating to neighbouring modules.It is found that the current levels of safety gaps between the liquefaction modules may be insufficient for the structural arrangement in place. It is thought that a new structural design using circular pipes as the structural elements instead of the I-beams may enhance the integrity of the top-side supporting structures against the impact of potential vapour cloud explosion. The effectiveness of the new structure is demonstrated by comparing it to the conventional supporting structure using I-beam members. This also implies that, by using pipe elements, the safety gaps can be reduced, thus making it possible to optimise the topside arrangement more easily.

KW - FLNG

KW - risk assessment

KW - safety

KW - safety gap

KW - structural strength

KW - vapour cloud explosion

KW - safety evaluation

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/ocean-engineering

U2 - 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.08.032

DO - 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.08.032

M3 - Article

VL - 149

SP - 423

EP - 437

JO - Ocean Engineering

T2 - Ocean Engineering

JF - Ocean Engineering

SN - 0029-8018

ER -