Post-structuralism and policy research in education

Walter Humes, Tom Bryce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper critically examines some of the challenges to policy research in education posed by post-modernist and post-structuralist thinking. It starts by characterizing those modernist and structuralist assumptions which have been subject to attack, but suggests that they are still very much in the ascendancy in the official discourse of educational research (as expressed, for example, by the National Educational Research Forum). Thereafter, key features of the assault represented by the work of Foucault, Derrida and Lyotard are outlined and an account of their destabilizing effect on intellectual work, for individuals and institutions, is offered. Several possible responses are considered. It is argued that policy research poses particular problems because, notwithstanding the messiness of the policy process, there must always come a point of closure on options: decisions cannot be delayed until the epistemological status of educational research is resolved. Researchers must find ways of negotiating the shifting configurations in the relationship between research, policy and practice. This will require both theoretical sophistication and robust engagement with issues that matter to practitioners.
LanguageEnglish
Pages175-187
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Educational Policy
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2003

Fingerprint

post-structuralism
research policy
educational research
intellectual work
education
research practice
assault
discourse

Keywords

  • policy research
  • education
  • post-modernism
  • post-structuralism

Cite this

@article{27ff6c739ef24dad88688da3ade395b0,
title = "Post-structuralism and policy research in education",
abstract = "This paper critically examines some of the challenges to policy research in education posed by post-modernist and post-structuralist thinking. It starts by characterizing those modernist and structuralist assumptions which have been subject to attack, but suggests that they are still very much in the ascendancy in the official discourse of educational research (as expressed, for example, by the National Educational Research Forum). Thereafter, key features of the assault represented by the work of Foucault, Derrida and Lyotard are outlined and an account of their destabilizing effect on intellectual work, for individuals and institutions, is offered. Several possible responses are considered. It is argued that policy research poses particular problems because, notwithstanding the messiness of the policy process, there must always come a point of closure on options: decisions cannot be delayed until the epistemological status of educational research is resolved. Researchers must find ways of negotiating the shifting configurations in the relationship between research, policy and practice. This will require both theoretical sophistication and robust engagement with issues that matter to practitioners.",
keywords = "policy research, education, post-modernism, post-structuralism",
author = "Walter Humes and Tom Bryce",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/0268093022000043056",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "175--187",
journal = "Journal of Educational Policy",
issn = "0268-0939",
number = "2",

}

Post-structuralism and policy research in education. / Humes, Walter; Bryce, Tom.

In: Journal of Educational Policy, Vol. 18, No. 2, 03.2003, p. 175-187.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Post-structuralism and policy research in education

AU - Humes, Walter

AU - Bryce, Tom

PY - 2003/3

Y1 - 2003/3

N2 - This paper critically examines some of the challenges to policy research in education posed by post-modernist and post-structuralist thinking. It starts by characterizing those modernist and structuralist assumptions which have been subject to attack, but suggests that they are still very much in the ascendancy in the official discourse of educational research (as expressed, for example, by the National Educational Research Forum). Thereafter, key features of the assault represented by the work of Foucault, Derrida and Lyotard are outlined and an account of their destabilizing effect on intellectual work, for individuals and institutions, is offered. Several possible responses are considered. It is argued that policy research poses particular problems because, notwithstanding the messiness of the policy process, there must always come a point of closure on options: decisions cannot be delayed until the epistemological status of educational research is resolved. Researchers must find ways of negotiating the shifting configurations in the relationship between research, policy and practice. This will require both theoretical sophistication and robust engagement with issues that matter to practitioners.

AB - This paper critically examines some of the challenges to policy research in education posed by post-modernist and post-structuralist thinking. It starts by characterizing those modernist and structuralist assumptions which have been subject to attack, but suggests that they are still very much in the ascendancy in the official discourse of educational research (as expressed, for example, by the National Educational Research Forum). Thereafter, key features of the assault represented by the work of Foucault, Derrida and Lyotard are outlined and an account of their destabilizing effect on intellectual work, for individuals and institutions, is offered. Several possible responses are considered. It is argued that policy research poses particular problems because, notwithstanding the messiness of the policy process, there must always come a point of closure on options: decisions cannot be delayed until the epistemological status of educational research is resolved. Researchers must find ways of negotiating the shifting configurations in the relationship between research, policy and practice. This will require both theoretical sophistication and robust engagement with issues that matter to practitioners.

KW - policy research

KW - education

KW - post-modernism

KW - post-structuralism

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0268093022000043056

U2 - 10.1080/0268093022000043056

DO - 10.1080/0268093022000043056

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 175

EP - 187

JO - Journal of Educational Policy

T2 - Journal of Educational Policy

JF - Journal of Educational Policy

SN - 0268-0939

IS - 2

ER -