Post-pandemic maternity care planning for vaccination: a qualitative study of the experiences of women, partners, health care professionals, and policy makers in the United Kingdom

The RESILIENT Study Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Maternal vaccination during pregnancy, in general and against COVID-19 infection, offers protection to both mother and baby, but uptake remains suboptimal. This study aimed to explore the perceptions regarding COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, particularly for marginalised populations and those living with social or medical complexity. A total of 96 semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 40 women, 15 partners, 21 HCPs, and 20 policy makers, across all four nations of the United Kingdom (UK), discussing their lived experience of utilising, delivering, or developing policy for COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy during the pandemic. Three themes were derived: (1) historical and social context, (2) communication of information and guidance, and (3) appraisal and action. Together these captured the participants’ legacy of mistrust in drugs during pregnancy; prior positive experiences; concerns about missing information, conflicting information, or false information about COVID-19 vaccines; and confusing guidance for pregnant women. The final theme describes the participants’ behaviour and actions undertaken consequent to their experiences and the available information. The findings suggest efforts to improve COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy may be best focused on personalised communication of information. A trusting relationship and prior positive experiences with other vaccines, both in and outside of pregnancy, positively influenced perceptions of COVID-19 vaccination.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1042
Number of pages16
JournalVaccines
Volume12
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Sept 2024

Funding

The RESILIENT Study was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Services & Delivery Research programme (ref: NIHR134293) awarded to Laura A. Magee, Sergio A. Silverio, Harriet Boulding, Abigail Easter, Aricca D. Van Citters, Asma Khalil, Eugene C. Nelson, Emma L., Duncan, Peter von Dadelszen, and Members of The RESILIENT Study Group. Sergio A. Silverio is in receipt of a Personal Doctoral Fellowship awarded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration—South London [NIHR ARC-SL] Capacity Building Theme (ref: NIHR-INF-2170). Tisha Dasgupta is in receipt of a Health Practices, Innovation & Implementation [HPII] Doctoral Fellowship (ref: ES/P00703/1) funded by the Economic & Social Research Council [ESRC] as part of the London Interdisciplinary Social Science Doctoral Training Partnership [LISS DTP]. Abigail Easter is supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration South London [NIHR ARC-SL] at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funders had no role in the work or writeup associated with this manuscript and the views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funders.

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • healthcare professionals
  • maternity care
  • partners
  • policy makers
  • qualitative research
  • vaccination
  • women
  • women’s health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Post-pandemic maternity care planning for vaccination: a qualitative study of the experiences of women, partners, health care professionals, and policy makers in the United Kingdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this