Positive and negative effects of widespread badger culling on tuberculosis in cattle

C.A. Donnelly, R. Woodroffe, D.R. Cox, F.J. Bourne, C.L. Cheeseman, Richard S. Clifton-Hadley, G. Wei, G. Gettinby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

278 Citations (Scopus)


Human and livestock diseases can be difficult to control where infection persists in wildlife populations. For three decades, European badgers (Meles meles) have been culled by the British government in a series of attempts to limit the spread of Mycobacterium bovis, the causative agent of bovine tuberculosis (TB), to cattle(1). Despite these efforts, the incidence of TB in cattle has risen consistently, re-emerging as a primary concern for Britain's cattle industry. Recently, badger culling has attracted controversy because experimental studies have reached contrasting conclusions ( albeit using different protocols), with culled areas showing either markedly reduced(2,3) or increased(4,5) incidence of TB in cattle. This has confused attempts to develop a science-based management policy. Here we use data from a large-scale, randomized field experiment to help resolve these apparent differences. We show that, as carried out in this experiment, culling reduces cattle TB incidence in the areas that are culled, but increases incidence in adjoining areas. These findings are biologically consistent with previous studies(2-5) but will present challenges for policy development.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)843-846
Number of pages3
Issue number7078
Publication statusPublished - 16 Feb 2006


  • mycobacterium bovis infection
  • meles-meles
  • Ireland
  • Badger culling


Dive into the research topics of 'Positive and negative effects of widespread badger culling on tuberculosis in cattle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this