Positioning Behaviour: ADHD in the post-welfare educational era

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As schooling at least partly concerns itself with formulating relationships, it is understandable that certain behaviours are seen as necessary to the advancement of learning and teaching. However, how pupil behaviour is judged is an indication of wider political perspectives, which in turn assist in the categorization of behaviour. In this respect, wider political perspectives require analysis if reactions to pupil behaviour are to be understood. Via the assertion that contemporary English Education is immersed in the target‐driven, economically determinist assumptions and orientations of the post‐welfare era, it is proposed that certain pupil behaviours are seen to be required, i.e. behaviours that supposedly engender increased performance on external examinations and tests. Problematically, such requirements effectively position some pupils outside this narrative, particularly those whose behaviour is deemed non‐compliant. Often speculation determines that such pupils might ‘have’ Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and following a ‘positive’ diagnosis they are thus pathologized. This paper contends that both parents and educational staff are complicit in the seemingly burgeoning diagnosis of ADHD but for different reasons: parents as a diagnosis offers mitigating circumstances for pupil behaviour and therefore increased entry prospects to those schools seen to do well; teachers as a means to mediate the seemingly contradictory policies of increased attainment and compliance with central mandate, and extensive calls for inclusion of pupils with Special Educational Needs (SEN).

LanguageEnglish
Pages113-125
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Inclusive Education
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

pupil behavior
ADHD
welfare
pupil
parents
special educational needs
speculation
indication
inclusion
staff
narrative
examination
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Education
Positioning
Teaching
teacher
Pupil
school
learning

Keywords

  • positioning behaviour
  • adhd
  • post welfare
  • educational era
  • formulating relationships
  • schooling

Cite this

@article{75d8425627cc41d8beda4ff958191adf,
title = "Positioning Behaviour: ADHD in the post-welfare educational era",
abstract = "As schooling at least partly concerns itself with formulating relationships, it is understandable that certain behaviours are seen as necessary to the advancement of learning and teaching. However, how pupil behaviour is judged is an indication of wider political perspectives, which in turn assist in the categorization of behaviour. In this respect, wider political perspectives require analysis if reactions to pupil behaviour are to be understood. Via the assertion that contemporary English Education is immersed in the target‐driven, economically determinist assumptions and orientations of the post‐welfare era, it is proposed that certain pupil behaviours are seen to be required, i.e. behaviours that supposedly engender increased performance on external examinations and tests. Problematically, such requirements effectively position some pupils outside this narrative, particularly those whose behaviour is deemed non‐compliant. Often speculation determines that such pupils might ‘have’ Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and following a ‘positive’ diagnosis they are thus pathologized. This paper contends that both parents and educational staff are complicit in the seemingly burgeoning diagnosis of ADHD but for different reasons: parents as a diagnosis offers mitigating circumstances for pupil behaviour and therefore increased entry prospects to those schools seen to do well; teachers as a means to mediate the seemingly contradictory policies of increased attainment and compliance with central mandate, and extensive calls for inclusion of pupils with Special Educational Needs (SEN).",
keywords = "positioning behaviour, adhd, post welfare , educational era, formulating relationships, schooling",
author = "Paul Adams",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/13603110600790423",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "113--125",
journal = "International Journal of Inclusive Education",
issn = "1360-3116",
number = "2",

}

Positioning Behaviour: ADHD in the post-welfare educational era. / Adams, Paul.

In: International Journal of Inclusive Education, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2008, p. 113-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Positioning Behaviour: ADHD in the post-welfare educational era

AU - Adams, Paul

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - As schooling at least partly concerns itself with formulating relationships, it is understandable that certain behaviours are seen as necessary to the advancement of learning and teaching. However, how pupil behaviour is judged is an indication of wider political perspectives, which in turn assist in the categorization of behaviour. In this respect, wider political perspectives require analysis if reactions to pupil behaviour are to be understood. Via the assertion that contemporary English Education is immersed in the target‐driven, economically determinist assumptions and orientations of the post‐welfare era, it is proposed that certain pupil behaviours are seen to be required, i.e. behaviours that supposedly engender increased performance on external examinations and tests. Problematically, such requirements effectively position some pupils outside this narrative, particularly those whose behaviour is deemed non‐compliant. Often speculation determines that such pupils might ‘have’ Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and following a ‘positive’ diagnosis they are thus pathologized. This paper contends that both parents and educational staff are complicit in the seemingly burgeoning diagnosis of ADHD but for different reasons: parents as a diagnosis offers mitigating circumstances for pupil behaviour and therefore increased entry prospects to those schools seen to do well; teachers as a means to mediate the seemingly contradictory policies of increased attainment and compliance with central mandate, and extensive calls for inclusion of pupils with Special Educational Needs (SEN).

AB - As schooling at least partly concerns itself with formulating relationships, it is understandable that certain behaviours are seen as necessary to the advancement of learning and teaching. However, how pupil behaviour is judged is an indication of wider political perspectives, which in turn assist in the categorization of behaviour. In this respect, wider political perspectives require analysis if reactions to pupil behaviour are to be understood. Via the assertion that contemporary English Education is immersed in the target‐driven, economically determinist assumptions and orientations of the post‐welfare era, it is proposed that certain pupil behaviours are seen to be required, i.e. behaviours that supposedly engender increased performance on external examinations and tests. Problematically, such requirements effectively position some pupils outside this narrative, particularly those whose behaviour is deemed non‐compliant. Often speculation determines that such pupils might ‘have’ Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and following a ‘positive’ diagnosis they are thus pathologized. This paper contends that both parents and educational staff are complicit in the seemingly burgeoning diagnosis of ADHD but for different reasons: parents as a diagnosis offers mitigating circumstances for pupil behaviour and therefore increased entry prospects to those schools seen to do well; teachers as a means to mediate the seemingly contradictory policies of increased attainment and compliance with central mandate, and extensive calls for inclusion of pupils with Special Educational Needs (SEN).

KW - positioning behaviour

KW - adhd

KW - post welfare

KW - educational era

KW - formulating relationships

KW - schooling

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13603110600790423

U2 - 10.1080/13603110600790423

DO - 10.1080/13603110600790423

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 113

EP - 125

JO - International Journal of Inclusive Education

T2 - International Journal of Inclusive Education

JF - International Journal of Inclusive Education

SN - 1360-3116

IS - 2

ER -